PDA

View Full Version : Inclusive club, open to all (except those we disagree with)



54FairAndSquare
11-08-2016, 07:35 PM
And if we disagree with them, that makes them subhuman

http://i64.tinypic.com/fkrx2t.png

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/bigot-brands-celtic-star-nir-8605486#EgUD8eb0KKl2mAmi.97

JackSnakes
12-08-2016, 05:01 AM
We done this the other day :zzz:

mogwaiCSC
12-08-2016, 06:41 AM
An utter dick who deserves whatever is coming to him and his annoyance appears to be at the fact he has been embraced by the Celtic support.

I'm a bit confused though with this poster 54square. He posted on the thread about the Rangers fan who had called for the ethnic cleansing of muslims and a bigoted rant about Father Daly. But not to condemn him but post whataboutery and claiming hypocrisy, yes the king of selective thread posting from trawling social media actually had the gumption to come out with that. How embarrassing.

JackSnakes
12-08-2016, 07:55 AM
His whole tenure on here has been a complete brasser...

Kittybrewster
12-08-2016, 08:35 AM
His whole tenure on here has been a complete brasser...

Good god. Is he an admin on here?

JackSnakes
12-08-2016, 09:09 AM
Good god. Is he an admin on here?

Christ no... He's just a c0ck

stewarty27
12-08-2016, 09:43 AM
Christ no... He's just a c0ck

A c0ck ?? surely thats too close to a compliment to such a sub-human. The poster IQ live permanently in the sewer you could take all the very worst of the gutter tabloid press roll them together and still wouldn't get as low as this kant. God knows whats going on in his mind when he starts his daily trawl of Right wing publications and social media.

JackSnakes
12-08-2016, 12:48 PM
As I said in post 2, we did this one the other day - it's old news...

Taintedice
12-08-2016, 01:57 PM
anyone who expects human-qualities from an ear-breathing fish needs their brain checked.

54FairAndSquare
14-08-2016, 10:26 AM
Snake doesn't want to talk about it cos we’ve talked about it before.

StewartyIQ27 thinks someone is “sub-human” because he doesn’t agree with their views.

There we have it folks, that’s what we’re up against.

JackSnakes
14-08-2016, 01:42 PM
Snake doesn't want to talk about it cos we’ve talked about it before.

StewartyIQ27 thinks someone is “sub-human” because he doesn’t agree with their views.

There we have it folks, that’s what we’re up against.

What you're up against, you complete d1ck, is people who don't want to rehash old stories and duplicate threads. The idiot who isn't fond of Bitton had already been covered in a thread about erseholes and their stupid prejudices. Surprised you didn't feature in that one since, if we are completely honest, you're an stupid prejudiced ersehole...

AguyIknow
16-08-2016, 02:40 PM
FFS can everybody just give over calling other people "sub human"? Whether we like them or not, agree with them or not, support the same team as them or not, every person is de facto a human being and is NOT "sub human".

People who use the term "sub human" are echoing n@zis who used the term to try cover up their mass killings as though the killing of what they termed "sub humans" wasn't really akin to the killing of real people. It was. And tw@ts trying to be clever by calling anyone "sub-human" needs a kick in the haw maws!

Mook1
16-08-2016, 03:25 PM
FFS can everybody just give over calling other people "sub human"? Whether we like them or not, agree with them or not, support the same team as them or not, every person is de facto a human being and is NOT "sub human".

People who use the term "sub human" are echoing n@zis who used the term to try cover up their mass killings as though the killing of what they termed "sub humans" wasn't really akin to the killing of real people. It was. And tw@ts trying to be clever by calling anyone "sub-human" needs a kick in the haw maws!

What about Kermit the Frog?

AguyIknow
16-08-2016, 04:12 PM
I blame the pools ;D

Mook1
16-08-2016, 04:16 PM
It isn't easy being green.

JackSnakes
16-08-2016, 04:26 PM
FFS can everybody just give over calling other people "sub human"? Whether we like them or not, agree with them or not, support the same team as them or not, every person is de facto a human being and is NOT "sub human".

People who use the term "sub human" are echoing n@zis who used the term to try cover up their mass killings as though the killing of what they termed "sub humans" wasn't really akin to the killing of real people. It was. And tw@ts trying to be clever by calling anyone "sub-human" needs a kick in the haw maws!

Hmm... Not really anything to do with nazis. The term has been in use for some time prior to the rise of German national socialism I believe...



Jist sayin like...

Taintedice
16-08-2016, 04:37 PM
Correct, jack. Huns existed long before Ad0lf.

AguyIknow
16-08-2016, 04:50 PM
Hmm... Not really anything to do with nazis. The term has been in use for some time prior to the rise of German national socialism I believe...



Jist sayin like...

Have a read of what i wrote - I don't recall saying they invented the term. Technically I think it may have an anthropological origin - just that they tried to dehumanise their victims by pretending that they were "sub human" - which neither they, nor anyone else alive is.

In use on this message board it's a malign term with a disgusting intent.

JackSnakes
16-08-2016, 06:50 PM
Have a read of what i wrote - I don't recall saying they invented the term. Technically I think it may have an anthropological origin - just that they tried to dehumanise their victims by pretending that they were "sub human" - which neither they, nor anyone else alive is.

In use on this message board it's a malign term with a disgusting intent.

Again, I beg to differ.
Its use on this board is in keeping with its general use. Yes, it is derogatory but usually refers to those whose attitudes are considered less than compassionate or not in keeping with the generally accepted norms. It does NOT mean that such people are not human beings - in fact, that is so far off target it's almost coming back to hit you in the erse.
The term may rip your knitting but that is only because you are reading too much into it.
Chillax man...

AguyIknow
17-08-2016, 08:34 AM
Again, I beg to differ.
Its use on this board is in keeping with its general use. Yes, it is derogatory but usually refers to those whose attitudes are considered less than compassionate or not in keeping with the generally accepted norms. It does NOT mean that such people are not human beings - in fact, that is so far off target it's almost coming back to hit you in the erse.
The term may rip your knitting but that is only because you are reading too much into it.
Chillax man...


Someone who's lower on compassion is referred to by more compassionate people as "sub human"?? Either you're on the wind up or you haven't the first clue what compassion even means :rolleyes:

JackSnakes
17-08-2016, 11:33 AM
Someone who's lower on compassion is referred to by more compassionate people as "sub human"?? Either you're on the wind up or you haven't the first clue what compassion even means :rolleyes:

You're being an erse now. Think what you like

54FairAndSquare
17-08-2016, 08:54 PM
If I could have picked 2 ppl on here to defend the use of 'sub-human' it would be Snake in the Grass and tittydice. :blue:

JackSnakes
17-08-2016, 09:19 PM
If I could have picked 2 ppl on here to defend the use of 'sub-human' it would be Snake in the Grass and tittydice. :blue:

Shut up you pathetic clown. No-one is defending anything.
God, you are such a tit.

Sevvy too 2
17-08-2016, 10:14 PM
Shut up you pathetic clown. No-one is defending anything.
God, you are such a tit.





Hes a Hun, so in fact, he's a sub human, a few markers missing off his DNA, akin to a chimp.

Rangersmandownunder
17-08-2016, 11:36 PM
I see Jack and Sevvy have their knickers oan too tight again. (wee bored smiley)

ZombieSkelper
18-08-2016, 08:01 AM
I see Jack and Sevvy have their knickers oan too tight again. (wee bored smiley)

Says the guy who's on greetin about sellik fans and their flags XD

Taintedice
18-08-2016, 12:39 PM
54iq/hunsdiedfairandsquare/sir walloper is the very definition of sub-human, his mocking of the six million killed by his beloved ad0lf is the only proof you need. Utter scvm.

54FairAndSquare
18-08-2016, 08:03 PM
Looks like the Dagenhan Dee is flipping his lid watching all those medals flood in for Team GB.

Taintedice
18-08-2016, 08:42 PM
Team Scotland are doing amazingly well, Larkhall Larry doesn't like it, obviously. Another reference to the 6million slaughtered from the sub-human walloper as well, truly disturbing.

Sevvy too 2
18-08-2016, 08:44 PM
team scotland are doing amazingly well, larkhall larry doesn't like it, obviously. Another reference to the 6million slaughtered from the sub-human walloper as well, truly disturbing.





larkhall larry! :D