No width n too much tinkering

[jocklatic]

Todays game was dire, we were lacking in direction & width. We had no one running the channels or creating any width. Huddersfield were crap n caught us out with a ball thar should have been in row z or way down their end of the field. 2 or 3 half chances just about summed us up. Only positive to be taken. Was our corners were better than normal!! As to Uwe- quit tinkering n play a settled side with what u think is ur best side ffs.

[grumpster]

Todays game was dire, we were lacking in direction & width. We had no one running the channels or creating any width. Huddersfield were crap n caught us out with a ball thar should have been in row z or way down their end of the field. 2 or 3 half chances just about summed us up. Only positive to be taken. Was our corners were better than normal!! As to Uwe- quit tinkering n play a settled side with what u think is ur best side ffs.

disagree, if he played our best side where's the excitement come from? indeed faffin abeht with ar side gives that 'edgy' unpredictability dunt it ;) that said we should have scutched that lot tday :blue:

[jocklatic]

Todays game was dire, we were lacking in direction & width. We had no one running the channels or creating any width. Huddersfield were crap n caught us out with a ball thar should have been in row z or way down their end of the field. 2 or 3 half chances just about summed us up. Only positive to be taken. Was our corners were better than normal!! As to Uwe- quit tinkering n play a settled side with what u think is ur best side ffs.

disagree, if he played our best side where's the excitement come from? indeed faffin abeht with ar side gives that 'edgy' unpredictability dunt it ;) that said we should have scutched that lot tday :blue:[/quote]
Disagree Grumps, look at Leicester, settled side n top of league. If we'd played with our 2 wide player we could have taken all 3 points. All for excitement but its points on the board we need.