|
| Forum: | Display: | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| You are not logged in (viewing only) | |||
| Post New Topic | LOGIN / Register | Customise View | RSS Feed | Return to Forum Home | |||
| - | Attention Aberdeen fans | Offer from | Posted |
 |
Challenge your friends and foes to put their money where their mouth is! | BuddyBet | 22 May 20:16 |
User is offline
Joined 06 Nov 2004
Total club posts 10097
Daily Average 3.237
Total FM posts 14508
Daily Average 4.652
|
foresthills Location: United Kingdom
Forum contributions
replied to Magennis Signs New Deal replied to anti-muslim neds at pittodrie on Saturday replied to Commons chucks International fitba' replied to The 16 Team League Solution replied to Daly To The Filth replied to Highlights are up replied to Just back replied to Stewart milne bammer replied to Next Season Kit replied to LGS and Final Score Competition - AFC V HoMFC replied to LSC Roll Call replied to Onybody else funcy a Phoenix Dazzler Top replied to Nial McGinn has agreed a 2 year contract extension replied to McInnes After New Goalie To Challenge Clangers! replied to Losing Heart(s)... replied to Becks packs it in replied to Major summer investment in Pittodrie pitch replied to Life should mean Life... replied to Dons crowds this season v rest replied to 7 released; Magennis stays replied to What's the funniest thing you've ever seen? replied to Mancini sacked replied to fit Phone?
I understand the argument against doing it and why a shiny new stadium makes sense. However something that crossed my mind was the shiny new stadium made sense in 2000 odd when Kingswells was on the cards. 13 years later we have left Pittodrie to lapse into a pretty shocking state and still dont have a spade mark in the ground for a shiney new stadium. I guess what im getting at is if we had redeveloped Pittodrie 13 years ago - and then taken in the extra income from corperate and possibly fans coming to a nicer stadium - we would be far better off today and still in our old home. Instead are still planning a fancy stadium (will believe it when I see it) with a capacity of over 20k while we close the top tier of the RDS to keep the 8-10,000 hardy souls together! If Loriston fails is it maybe time to look at a reasonable redevelopment of the ground again? Or will we continue to hemmorage revenue due to the state of it while we plan more imaginary stadiums? The New Stadium argument maybe a winner but that argument only works if we actually build one. 11 May 2013 11:09 Started on 'Stand Free Forum' forum
Forum contributions
replied to Obsession with rangers |
