Printable View
The fa has changed Peter Beardsley with 3 counts of using insulting language to Newcastle trainees article E3(1)
He has until Friday 12th of April to contest the charges.
What can they do to him if he’s not currently employed by the club or has no involvement in football at the moment?.
Total shambles yet again.
Well, if he's guilty, he deserves to be legally punished.
I suppose, given that he's lost his job he has, really, HughieQuote:
Originally Posted by HughieG
I don't think it really matters what the FA do. The damage has already been done. I doubt clubs are going to be inundating him with offers after what went on.
It's shame it has to end for him like this but being a big name doesn't command respect if respect isn't returned.
One of the best players we've ever had.
I'd still love to see both sides of the coin. It appears he's not getting his say. I hope he does so we can all get the bigger picture.
However, he did have to go anyway. It was clear the job he was doing was having a negative effect.
A bit odd how they chose not to pixel out Beardsley number plate as he left the ground. Yet hasn't been convicted of anything in a court.
So now insulting language is a criminal offence we're having a larf aren't weQuote:
Originally Posted by tooslomofo
Speculation everywhere and noone has a clue what he´s supposed to have done/said. Feckin hysteria, man.
Someone else raised this point.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stanleymag
In a court of law you're correct. However in the FA - charged means guilty. He can appeal but at the minute he's regarded as guilty.
He's not employed but they can hit him with a ban when he rejoins a club, they can hit him with a fine as well.