Printable View
Yes not really a debate with Mr Panza really. You would both firmly appear to be in the No camp. More of a "love in " on your part with a few differences over the economy and continuing Eu membership. And you are not that feckin smart its "moot " point not mute ffsQuote:
Originally Posted by Getintaethem
I see the Nats are reverting to type and are starting the name calling and swearing again. They wonder why people get turned off by them and don't vote for independence.Quote:
Originally Posted by kigoretrout
I made a typo... shoot me. I will make sure I read though all posts from now on as the Nat "English" police are out in force.
Sancho is pretty level headed as far as I can see. He is also a supporter of independence now. Just the sort of people the Nats should be going after and trying to convince with reasoned arguments - not the usual diatribe.
I would re-read your posts min. You are very thin skinned and if anyone has the temerity of criticising you there is a stock response that they are being abusive. Maybe if you weren't so condescending and dismissive in your responses then you wouldn't provoke some of the comments you get on here. Ps google narcissistic personality disorder. Only joking min please don't take offence.
And if we want to be entirely accurate and pedantic. I know pot calling kettle black and all that it wasn't a typo it was confusing one word with another. Mute was spelt perfectly well as I remember
Mason, knuckle dragging IRA supporting Celtic fans are in favour of independence. How do you like being on the same side as them?
I do not set out to be condescending nor dismissive but if that is how your read my posts then I will take your views onboard for the future. Also, if I explicitly wanted to be condescending and dismissive I could have, for example, given that you called me out of my typo, fixed all your English grammatical errors in your previous post.Quote:
Originally Posted by kigoretrout
In my opinion, criticising what people believe is fair game. I would also say it would be best to do that with a counter argument. Criticising people for their beliefs is, however, not fair game. When someone calls all people Huns that voted No - this is offensive and I make no apology for calling him out on it. Those posts should be deleted.
If we want to be entirely accurate and pedantic, a typo, is in fact a shortened version of the phrase typographical error. It explicitly excludes spelling mistakes.
I agree with that and it is certainly not a view any reasonable person would share. He was I would suggest on the wind up, as was I to a lesser extent. We are, however, dealing with a topic which provokes strong opinions and will regrettably in my opinion only get more toxic as the months progress.
Don't think so. They're paranoid about being left in a small country ran by Huns. A yes vote is really the only option open to anyone calling themselves an Aberdeen fan :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Jupiter
They can say what they like about you, Mason (and they usually do!) but you're a breath of fresh air on the board. Dodgy name though...Quote:
Originally Posted by Mason89
Illegitimi non carborundum (Wait till the grammar specialists see this)
Yup Mason is indeed one of the best posters on here.Quote:
Originally Posted by Donanddusted
jupiter knuckle dragging UDA, Orange Order supporting Huns are in favour of the union. How do you like being on the same side as them?Quote:
Originally Posted by Jupiter