Originally Posted by
Despair
I'm so, so sorry to keep on but the only thing I can see that's wrong is the overlording 'leadership' of our not so well received owners.
I can only guess at what the motivational atmos is like whilst under the duress of these 'absent landlords'.
So if a large proportion of the support base has no desire to be 'involved' with the circus, why should the more recent mercenary acquisitions. The only place that has really been 'buzzing' is the treatment ward!!!
On the subject of Venkys - why? Having read a few pieces where it's said that just simply being owners of a UK footie club is means enough to elevate their core business/s. I am now forming the view that just maybe their 'signal' in doing so could well be - 'OK we're not where we where, but who cares and in any case we are so mega rich we can sustain it. That's how rich we are.
Maybe that's the 'mindset' of the circles in which they move and operate.
As for the 'minions' beneath them, so what, they are of no consequence.
JMHI