'But for the width of the crossbar that would have been a goal..'
At the risk of being pedantic can I point out that this oft used expression by football commentators doesn't actually make sense?
The crossbar does not prevent goals from going in. :/
re: 'But for the width of the crossbar that would have been a goal..'
It's saturday morning, grown men everywhere are waking up to their girlfriends, lovers, wives, thinking of how to spend their hard earned cash at the weekend, people are preparing to travel to see the world, catch a flight somewhere, experience some culture, and then....there's pysh like this being posted from that hellhole straight from apocalypse now called Paisley
re: 'But for the width of the crossbar that would have been a goal..'
Is this your latest idea of 'patter' gers? Need tae try harder I think. :/
re: 'But for the width of the crossbar that would have been a goal..'
Yes, yes it is, I'm sorry but you're hardly inspiring with giving me that kind of material to work on, for phuck sake man find something topical , at this stage I'd even entertain a Daily Mail headline.
re: 'But for the width of the crossbar that would have been a goal..'
Sorry, but it's not my job to make you interesting. :/
re: 'But for the width of the crossbar that would have been a goal..'
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheLastFootballFan
Sorry, but it's not my job to make you interesting. :/
You could try and make yourself interesting.
re: 'But for the width of the crossbar that would have been a goal..'
Good advice: I suggest you take it. :/
re: 'But for the width of the crossbar that would have been a goal..'
Quote:
Originally Posted by noahrab
Sorry, but it's not my job to make you interesting. :/
You could try and make yourself interesting.[/quote]
Ooooft! That's a pus shutter if ever there was one! :D
