Bad attitude and disruptive but I can't mention who told me. I think there is a clue there somewhere that Queens was about his 15th club and add in the fact that he has had two or three spells with some of those teams.
Printable View
I agree to a point. For me Stirling is inconsistent, Murray imo isn't quite good enough but will get there, bell just won't be good enough for the championship, Todd is a player who is good, but the point I'm making is this. There's a lot of people who is slating Harkins but ive heard nothing to say he is to blame. One thing I'm sure of. It's not a happy changing room. A lot of our senior players have left with rumours of fall outs under naysmith. His methods appear to me to be questionable and not attractive but it is effective considering where we are in the league and the budget he has. That said I wonder where he'd be without dobbie!! Harkins was a good player have no doubt about that and it's a big loss to the team that doesn't have enough good players
Its the old chicken and the egg situation. We have young players who are not quite there yet but needs games so they can get there. A lot of people don't have patience in the meantime but thats life.
Absolutely, without even looking at his history you could see that, every time he was subbed walking off shaking his head and not applauding fans back. We as a club just have a bit of a track record of falling out with players and it makes you wonder are we unlucky or could it actually be us.
No good keeping a unhappy player though so it was the right thing to do. I just think he's going to take some serious replacing.
As I said Deek , Harkins has had more clubs than Tiger Woods and has obviously fell out with quite a few managers in his time . The other well publicised one's that left us were Baird and Kerr who also have had many clubs. I am not privy to the going's on in the Palmerston dressing room but the evidence woukd suggest these three dont settle anywhere for too long and if thats the case , then Queens aren't really to blame.
It is odds - on that Billy Hewitson and his two fellow directors would have backed the manager to the hilt over the
decision to let Harkins go ! - the only way is up though we might struggle as it has been obvious for a long time
that the squad is far too small and the bench weak but hopefully we will have new players coming
in soon.
This will be the usual crap. He has been contacted by a central belt club about coming to them. He then makes a bit of a 'nuisance' of himself at parent club to make sure he's let go . You watch !
I doubt thats the case at all,
He's probably sussed Nayidea as being clueless and negative and had cross words with him .
He doesn't like experienced players at the club hence there's non there.
With the exception of Dobbie of course of which he has no say whatsoever and without he would have been sacked 12 months ago.
I didn't not doubt for a minute if Nayidea hit a sniff of any sort of job at a club with a bigger budget he'd be off like a shot.
yep jr that scenario is all too familiar ,but i suppose we can look at it like this ,thats freed up a decent wage for a replacement ,this is where our manager needs to earn his corn and get the right man in that can drive us forward in the midfield area ,possibly another striker on loan aswell
If thats the case then 'Nayidea' as you call him is just the same as Chisholm, McIntyre , Johnson etc etc except that Naysmith is still here and the rest buggered off by now.. I suggest you look at Harkins career to get a clue of his behaviour. Yet another talented player ( no doubt) that has unfulfilled his potential and aimlessly drifted from club to club.