Maybe all this litigation nonsense is a masterstroke by our owners to hide the fact that we're rich enough to bid £5m for a striker ;)
Printable View
surely the season long loan player has to be sam gallagher as for waghorn he would also be a great signing but according to our reliable source mr nixon clubs miles apart they want 5m i reckon we may have bid 2m
Its really extraordinary that against the back drop of the ownership issues, the football side appears to have been isolated sufficiently for CW to work a bit of magic. I can only conclude that despite the differences and disputes, both owners at least appreciate that now is not the time to shove it all down the toilet.
according to daily mail weve bid 5m for waghorn be a great signing that would 16 last season and 11 assists for a poor team i reckon weve bid somat like 3.5 and another 1.5 if we get promoted so maybe mcgoldrick and waghorn will be the 2 strikers coming in and possibly woodburn on loan chris may have ditched gallagher hogan and gregory utb ftp
There appeared to be a lot of hystrionics when papers were published but both owners had said they had agreed a budget for chris to work to,virtually everybody chose to ignore this in light of the new evidence but it looks like twirls may just be telling the truth and the budget is what it is and we will get some players in chris wants and if he can't get them in then it's down to his principles and the greed of agents and not our bickering owners let's face it its in both their interests for the club to do well