Not a chance mate. The Family's version is by far the best.
Not my cup of tea. Very powerful, yes, but completely OTT in terms of drama. The value of the S and G version was in the harmonies. This is just brute force to me. (Still, I agree with Frog on most things so I doubt I'm off his Christmas card list for this...)
If we're including covers of pretty obscure originals (eg The Animals version of the House of The Rising Sun) I would throw in all the Rolling Stones hits before they self-penned "Tell Me" ("Come On", "It's All Over Now", "Little Red Rooster", "Not Fade Away" and even Lenon and McCartney's "I Wanna Be Your Man") I've never been a major Stones fan but I would give them 100% credit for lifting these semi-known R and B songs to a whole new level - and introducing most American ****agers to their own musical heritage...
One of the songs on the Golddigger album is a cover of a S Club 7 which at first gets you thinking where you've heard it before.
Here's a link to all the covers on that album. I have to admit that I have been told off whist singing this album on a beach. Not because they're bad songs it's because I'm crap at singing
If anyone is trying to remember a cover this site may help.
https://www.whosampled.com/
No offence taken smelly! My mother bought me the 'Simon and Garfunkle - The collection' as a pressent which I play whist at home alone sometimes. That is except one of the discs which although it has been printed along wit the other 5 it doesn't have a single song burnt onto it.
Never mind about that frog. Just get CT red-carded for not liking the Disturbed song.
Only joking of course and I get what he means about brute force. I think there is a fair amount of subtlety in the track though - the piano opening, the strings, the gradual increase in drum tempo. Although it's probably a bit of a musical cliche I do love a bit of crescendo.
Not brute force for Disturbed at least. Positively serene compared with their other stuff, which I've tried to get into and can't