In the league cup?
Printable View
I won't vote for Corbyn again, but I have (what I think) are good reasons for that. Which are that I don't think he is offering opposition to this terrible government, I didn't like the way he handled the Russia poisoning situation but mostly because I think the Labour Party's position is massively wrong on Brexit.
However, there is absolutely no doubt he has been treated appallingly by the press and has basically been smeared. To such an extent people seem to think he is 'Anti-British' or a 'Terrorist sympathiser' or he will 'break the country' with his financial policies (As if Theresa May hasn't).
Can I ask you LB, where do you read your news sources? What evidence do you have he is Anti-British? This is a guy who has been a serving UK MP since the early 1980's. And the press are trying to push the agenda that he is a Soviet spy - have you ever heard so much crap...ever?? Our security and defence specialists are among the best in the world, do you really think they would not know absolutely everything about the leader of the opposition?
I think Corbyn's made some valid points about our past foreign policy and how it has made us more susceptible to a terrorist attack. And for this he seems to be labelled 'Anti British'?
I steer clear of believing anything read in the press, across the whole spectrum - Left and Right. But remember, these newspapers have an agenda. Of the 10 best sellers, 8 of them endorse the Conservative Party. Those 8 are run by billionaires, who will avoid paying tax at any price and who have a major influence in how this country is run. The Sun has endorsed every party who has won power in the last 40 years.
I genuinely hope with the rise of social media, the non tax paying puppet masters influence will diminish.
ALWAYS QUESTION YOUR NEWS SOURCES!
Anyway, Rant over!
you don’t have to read the press or believe the media in General listen to him talk then you know why he’s been on the perhiery of the Labour Party all this time.he comes across very false , any leader that can pick McDonnell abbot and lady thornberry as shadow cabinet, bet Wilson Turing in his grave.
Not taking sides as I generally steer clear of politics on here, but 'Google' irony and read the highlighted/underlined text above......
....... social media is largely dependent upon the tight fisted duplicitous w@nkers, and their bare faced 'creative' accounting knows virtually no bounds >;) .
Maybe, maybe not. But then I've never looked into their political, 'charitable' or philanthropic contributions or their motivations for such. However, these tax dodgers and their search engines host social media (the ironic part), which is arguably even more open to online thought manipulation than the printed/online press.
Social media is a wonderful concept affording information at the touch of a button. But it's open to nuances, some far more subtle than others. Trends, adverts, soundbites and in many instances down right lies which are absorbed by lazy and gullible minds. It doesn't really matter how you source information so long as you source enough of it, know how to interpret it and inform your decisions accordingly.
A brazier - that huge can with holes in full of burning wood?! Wow!
Remember when we were kids and made fire cans and whizzed them around? A firecan and a feel of tit, easily pleased weren't we?