Why make a single reply when you can post 2?
Comedy gold as usual, but double the fun.
:P
Printable View
Why make a single reply when you can post 2?
Comedy gold as usual, but double the fun.
:P
One problem with your theory, Stenson, is that it revolves about there being a brain in situ. I have yet to see anything that would suggest any form of sentient intelligence exists between the ears. Just a waste of cellular material - when you consider the wondrous make up of the cells in the human body it seems a real waste of resource to use it in that.
Mrs F is a big fan of Johnny ('fellow Scot' probably a big factor) and described him on Sunday as a 'disruptor', a player who's useful just for putting the opposition off their plan - like a (not as good) Carlin or Gemmill. Just such a shame he misses that last 5%.
He's not 'talking balls' at all. He's just deigned to disagree with you. JR's performance was high on commitment but relatively low on quality. He never stopped running, was a thorn in Forest's side all afternoon and, imo, got the motm award for his enthusiasm and willingness to work for ninety minutes. Doesn't alter the fact that, like Lawrence, Forsyth and Huddlestone, he gave the ball away too often.
If russell was a thorn in the florist's side, was thorn a russell (sic) in the hedgerow and the whole thing just a spring clean for the may queen (Theresa?)
Bring back old memories Rog of rustle in the hedgerow?