Change

[Bstand]

President Rush our chief executive has overseen 3 years of underperformance, 4 managers and some very expensive questionable transfers.
When a company under performs 3 years in a row then it is time to look for a new Chief Executive, why should DCFC be different?
I fully expect to be pilloried for this post but If anyone can put up a counter argument I would be very interested in their logic.

[woolwhacker]

I think the fact you sat in B stand explains your sunny outlook

[swaledale]

President Rush our chief executive has overseen 3 years of underperformance, 4 managers and some very expensive questionable transfers.
When a company under performs 3 years in a row then it is time to look for a new Chief Executive, why should DCFC be different?
I fully expect to be pilloried for this post but If anyone can put up a counter argument I would be very interested in their logic.

I can see where your coming from, but a football club is not like a normal business where one ca measure performance, isn't finishing in the top 10 for the past 3 years a reasonable out come? Its only this last season which has seen significantly higher expenditure and if Mel's forced Rush to sack McClaren and then Clement, he can hardly be held responsible can he?

[tamworthram]

President Rush our chief executive has overseen 3 years of underperformance, 4 managers and some very expensive questionable transfers.
When a company under performs 3 years in a row then it is time to look for a new Chief Executive, why should DCFC be different?
I fully expect to be pilloried for this post but If anyone can put up a counter argument I would be very interested in their logic.

Depends on how you define under performing. Whilst we'd all like promotion it's pretty arrogant to assume we have a right to expect it. Play-offs in 2 out of 3 seasons isn't too shabby. Most companies don't play in leagues but, if they did I don't think they'd be sacking their CEO for finishing 3rd, 8th and 5th out of 24.

With regard to expensive and questionable transfers, again this is subjective and I wasn't aware Rush finds the transfer targets or signs the cheques.

In short, a pretty daft idea. Getting rid of Rush now (or even le

[Bstand]

President Rush our chief executive has overseen 3 years of underperformance, 4 managers and some very expensive questionable transfers.
When a company under performs 3 years in a row then it is time to look for a new Chief Executive, why should DCFC be different?
I fully expect to be pilloried for this post but If anyone can put up a counter argument I would be very interested in their logic.

Depends on how you define under performing. Whilst we'd all like promotion it's pretty arrogant to assume we have a right to expect it. Play-offs in 2 out of 3 seasons isn't too shabby. Most companies don't play in leagues but, if they did I don't think they'd be sacking their CEO for finishing 3rd, 8th and 5th out of 24.

With regard to expensive and questionable transfers, again this is subjective and I wasn't aware Rush finds the transfer targets or signs the cheques.

In short, a pretty

[mistaram]

Tamworth. what planet are you living on What underporformances are you talking about "" answer please " Are you serious or just being controversial like Rats . Or are just one of those who expects us to walk this league For a start the CEO does not find new players the director of football and manager do that We have4full time scouts and Mel always said Clements had the final say SR has always gone the extra mile to put the fans first the South Stand being one for years the police stopped us doing it but he got it done What positives has he done well sacking Clough McLaren Clements for a start To getrid would be a big mistake because we've all seen some we've had in the past ie TomGlick

[tamworthram]

[quote="mistaram" Are you serious or just being controversial like Rats . Or are just one of those who expects us to walk this league For a start the CEO does not find new players the director of football and manager do that We have4full time scouts and Mel always said Clements had the final say SR has always gone the extra mile to put the fans first the South Stand being one for years the police stopped us doing it but he got it done What positives has he done well sacking Clough McLaren Clements for a start To getrid would be a big mistake because we've all seen some we've had in the past ie TomGlick
[/quote]

Calm down Misteram. I live on planet earth and if you read my post properly you'll see I'm not suggesting we've under-performed and said anyone who thinks we have is a little arrogant. I also doubted Rush is responsible for the transfers. Per

[AnagRam]

I'm confused...I know I've had a glass or two but I think the target of your wrath is Bstand, not Tamworth, mistaram.

[tamworthram]

President Rush our chief executive has overseen 3 years of underperformance, 4 managers and some very expensive questionable transfers.
When a company under performs 3 years in a row then it is time to look for a new Chief Executive, why should DCFC be different?
I fully expect to be pilloried for this post but If anyone can put up a counter argument I would be very interested in their logic.

Depends on how you define under performing. Whilst we'd all like promotion it's pretty arrogant to assume we have a right to expect it. Play-offs in 2 out of 3 seasons isn't too shabby. Most companies don't play in leagues but, if they did I don't think they'd be sacking their CEO for finishing 3rd, 8th and 5th out of 24.

With regard to expensive and questionable transfers, again this is subjective and I wasn't aware Rush finds the transfer targets or s

[AnagRam]

President Rush our chief executive has overseen 3 years of underperformance, 4 managers and some very expensive questionable transfers.
When a company under performs 3 years in a row then it is time to look for a new Chief Executive, why should DCFC be different?
I fully expect to be pilloried for this post but If anyone can put up a counter argument I would be very interested in their logic.

Well you weren't disappointed in the 'pilloried' department and the 'counter argument logic' seems quite strong to me.