Lies

[6EQUJ5]

There are plenty of accusations of club executives being habitual liers. This occurrs most often in the cases of John Nixon and Nigel Clibbens. But are these accusations legitimate? I think not.

JN is, quite rightly, unpopular with the overwhelming majority of supporters. They often list his legion of faults, which it is perfectly reasonable to do. Then they add on the extra fault, that he is in the habit of telling lies. He is certainly not in the habit of telling lies. In the next day or two I will show irrefutable evidence on here of JN telling a lie but this is not a habit of his.

NC does not tell lies, that is my belief. He is unpopular with a significant percentage of supporters because they believe that he does not supply enough of the very important information to supporters. He may well be justified in this because to supply this information may well have a detrimental effect on the club, were it to be known to other clubs. He may also be under orders from Holdings not to supply some information to supporters. So, he has to inhibit the supply of some information that supporters are keen to know. This makes him unpopular. No doubt supporters can also add other matters to a list of his faults, including the telling of lies. Since NC has arrived there has been a steadily increasing amount of information supplied to supporters and he does not tell lies.

Here is the point. Some folk who dislike JN and NC claim that both of them are frequent liers, so to speak. This is not the case at all. Anyone who wishes to state that either of them is a frequent lier should provide specific evidence to prove it. Hearsay is not evidence. Amongst that which may be regarded as evidence is a quote from an article on the club's website written by either of them, or an audio clip, or a piece of video. Not only do we need evidence that they have actually written or said it but also we need evidence that it is a lie.

I can provide evidence of JN telling a lie and will do so on here. But in no way do I make a claim that he is a habitual lier. A couple of folk who no longer post on here were often aghast when asked to actually provide evidence of their bizarre assertions, simply because they could not produce such evidence. Foul and abusive language ensued, which was utterly pathetic.