As I said on a previous thread, Wimbledon are no shrinking violets. I do think they are more spoilers than dirty however. How many times did they appeal for fouls and how many times did they push players in the back? They also had a very strange idea of where the ball went out at throw ins. The ref let a few things go, but is that better than continually stopping play? That I feel would have benefitted them more than us. I thought the ref did okay.

I believe it was crucial that the Millers got the first goal. They had to come out more, which of course they did in the second half. A contribution to factor was also the Palmer tired a little in the second half which was to be expected. Our defence were excellent because they rarely got through to cause problems.

Great win against a very competitive team.