Tae give McInnes a ****sy bit o' credit, Ah reckon he views our 'convincing' wins against lowly opposition the same way as fans on this forum do .... i.e. great stuff/ugly win/good we got four, but why lose two/3 points could hae been the 1 but for the keeper's middle fingernail etc .... and realises ( as many here, happy clappers and punts pishers alike have stated ... publicly ) we will never get wa wi' that versus Cheek FC ... nor on form 'middlers' .... and so?
... Well, it's nae rocket science. If the thrust o' McInnes's remit wis tae simply tae be able tae say 'GIRFUY SF forum' then he wid cut 'n' paste the team sheet fae the PJM's game ..... and ... we wid get stuffed, mounted, and pished on for good measure .... and then, he wid only be sayin 'GIRFUY' tae aboot half o' us .... the rest o' us of course wid question why he put a team oot tae face 'better' opposition than .... well ... the last ****e team fa gied us a scare - even tho' we won the game.
For me, McInnes' failin is nae team selection and tactics .... it's that we are, man for man, position for position, nae good enough.... yet! On oor day? It'll be oor day.
But .... Whilst nae downin any player's contribution ... which Ah could easily, but winna ... Ah think we all agree, there are poss half a dizzen fa are proven tae be 'jist nae good enough' ... and there is possibly an equal number fa should at least be given the chance tae be 'jist nae good enough'. ... Except .... unless ye gie these guys a chance at the 'diddy' games, they will always be ( or at least always seen tae be ) 'jist nae good enough'.
So tae conclude ... Ah think Deek is on a hidin' tae nithin wi' what he has tae work wi .... but .... Ah believe if he took mair chances in the diddy games, he wid learn mair aboot what he has in his armoury for the 'big' games.
..... maybe it's the wee games the DM punts-pish happens .. ken?
Reply With Quote