Quote Originally Posted by Old_pie View Post
They make their laws and their laws say that she is automatically a citizen by descent. Read their THE CITIZENSHIP ACT, 1951. The don't have to "consider her as one of their own", she just is regardless of where she was born and where she was brought up.

Which means that the UK is not making her stateless by withdrawing her UK citizenship and is not breaking any international conventions.

What Bangladesh then do is up to them but as of now it seems as if Bangladesh is her only state, and they don't want terrorists, but they will have to take those steps according to their laws and international conventions.
Is she a terrorist?