Well Done ST!

[RogerTheAlien]

**** ST. OP wrote by a bluenose.

[thefutureistangerine4]

I love it!

One outstanding performance against struggling Falkirk and this board is totally positive.

Just shows ye, it doesn't take much to please this lot.

Actually 3 decent performances in a row. 9 points out of 9. Away win against (bogey team) Dumbarton. Home win against league leaders and then complete domination against last years second top team. New manager appointed who appears to have a bit about him. Is this not cause for positivism or would you prefer for the doom and gloom to continue. Nobody saying the job is done but we are at last heading in right direction!

[thefutureistangerine4]

oh, have I wound you up offshore.....? why not ban me again for having a different view from you? If you are not interested in this thread then ignore it and find something to do that doesn't wind you up....maybe watch I'm a Celebrity or something?

[thefutureistangerine4]

**** ST. OP wrote by a bluenose.

Care to clarify how my post makes me a bluenose?

[thefutureistangerine4]

Care to clarify how my post makes me a bluenose?

Apparently it is not permitted on this forum to make any positive comment about the chairman. It is the perceived consensus of the main contributors on this board that we are only allowed to write negatively about him due to the mistakes he has made in the past. Would this forum not be a duller place if we all shared the same views? It certainly feels like certain people on here want to chase away any posters who challenge their version of reality. This seems to be intellectual cowardice in the extreme....

[Charlie arab]

Apparently it is not permitted on this forum to make any positive comment about the chairman. It is the perceived consensus of the main contributors on this board that we are only allowed to write negatively about him due to the mistakes he has made in the past. Would this forum not be a duller place if we all shared the same views? It certainly feels like certain people on here want to chase away any posters who challenge their version of reality. This seems to be intellectual cowardice in the extreme....

Agreed, different opinions is what makes the board worth reading

[JamesMcClean]

Apparently it is not permitted on this forum to make any positive comment about the chairman. It is the perceived consensus of the main contributors on this board that we are only allowed to write negatively about him due to the mistakes he has made in the past. Would this forum not be a duller place if we all shared the same views? It certainly feels like certain people on here want to chase away any posters who challenge their version of reality. This seems to be intellectual cowardice in the extreme....

I think it's clear you have your views on Mr Chairman. It is also pertinently obvious that myself and many others have our own. Yes we are seeing some shoots of recovery, which is great and further there is not one Arab who does not want to see our team performing to its very best on the park. However it is not contradictory that these wishes can be held at the same time as being ambivalent at best with regard to ST. I simply can't understand why this topic was started just as we're getting it together.

With regard to the Chairman specifically, I am willing to move on but I am neither willing to forgive nor certainly forget.

[smirky4]

Its a bit like thanking a Tin of Ronseal

ST is only doing what he's supposed to as Chairman, and after the cluster he's caused in the past its the least we expect.

[TerryTheTerror]

Apparently it is not permitted on this forum to make any positive comment about the chairman.

All views welcome, no doubt you are in a minority with this subject though.

[Jim_Jam]

Apparently it is not permitted on this forum to make any positive comment about the chairman. .

This seems to be intellectual naivety in the extreme to post you love ST and expect no reaction...that's what the board is about.