+ Visit Aberdeen FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results

View Poll Results: Who's going to win the world cup?

Voters
56. You may not vote on this poll
Page 39 of 67 FirstFirst ... 29373839404149 ... LastLast
Results 381 to 390 of 667

Thread: World Cup

  1. #381
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    5,193
    Quote Originally Posted by theram1975 View Post
    Maradona's in some state tonight.

  2. #382
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    4,843
    Germany got twice as many votes as any other country on our poll. Obviously a lot of people on this board don't know much about football.

  3. #383
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    7,844
    Quote Originally Posted by Pacman1903 View Post
    Is qualifying decided by GD or head to head
    Head to head, then goal difference, then (might be goals scored), then fair play, then toss of a coin.
    So if it’s a draw between Belgium and England, it will depend on bookings.
    England has two yellows, Belgium has three.

  4. #384
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,782
    Quote Originally Posted by Jupiter View Post
    Germany got twice as many votes as any other country on our poll. Obviously a lot of people on this board don't know much about football.
    That will be the pant pishers then

  5. #385
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    4,843
    There should be more stoppage time

    https://fivethirtyeight.com/features...ly-inaccurate/

  6. #386
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    6,266
    Can anyone explain this utter sh1te about the loser of England-Belgium supposedly having the advantage for the rest of the tournament? The argument seems to rest on the fact that the winner will probably play Brazil in the quarters - so phkn what? England can just as easily get horsed aff Colombia next round; Belgium could well beat Brazil. Since when did it become undesirable to win a match? Twitter gimps, honestly.

  7. #387
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    4,843
    Quote Originally Posted by Jormungand View Post
    Can anyone explain this utter sh1te about the loser of England-Belgium supposedly having the advantage for the rest of the tournament? The argument seems to rest on the fact that the winner will probably play Brazil in the quarters - so phkn what? England can just as easily get horsed aff Colombia next round; Belgium could well beat Brazil. Since when did it become undesirable to win a match? Twitter gimps, honestly.
    Who would you rather play in the quarter finals, Brazil or Sweden/Switzerland? That's why it was better to lose tonight.

  8. #388
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,741
    If you think about the draw as four quarters each with four teams trying to make the semi-final then the England quarter is clearly the weakest.

    If you look at the odds for winning the tournament at the moment, for instance, Colombia are the 9th best team and Switzerland are the 11th best team (Sweden 13th). Every other quarter they could have ended up in involves beating a team much better than those three: Brazil (favourites), Spain (second favourites), France (5th favourites).

  9. #389
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    2,191
    I've been pretty underwhelmed by the overall standard of the football. The standard at Euro 2016 was poor as well. The inflow of money in modern football doesn't seem to correlate with an increase in quality. Perhaps the concentration of resources in a small number of leagues and clubs and the heightened financial stakes of elite club football has resulted in smaller arena for world class talent to develop.

    Compare with France 98 and Euro 2000 - probably the last two tournaments before the Champions League became the be all and end all. There were three or four teams in each of those who would comfortably be favourites in this WC.

  10. #390
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    30,497
    Quote Originally Posted by ragnarok View Post
    I've been pretty underwhelmed by the overall standard of the football. The standard at Euro 2016 was poor as well. The inflow of money in modern football doesn't seem to correlate with an increase in quality. Perhaps the concentration of resources in a small number of leagues and clubs and the heightened financial stakes of elite club football has resulted in smaller arena for world class talent to develop.

    .
    i.e Modern fitba is a bit f@cked these days

Page 39 of 67 FirstFirst ... 29373839404149 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •