Obviously we will require a substantial amount of compensation for our loss, but it would be unfair to stand in his way at this time.
Obviously we will require a substantial amount of compensation for our loss, but it would be unfair to stand in his way at this time.
He was hard done by at Mansfield. Haslam concocted some story about him bullying a youth team player and sacked him. Curle later won a wrongful-dismissal case and got compensation. There are those among our support who also remember him as rubbish, even though he got us to a play-off final on a shoestring and with a monster chairman like Haslam.
It's really not that difficult if you open your eyes...
“His remit will be a broad one to match his tremendous knowledge, experience and breadth of contacts.
“...while also being responsible for setting the club’s overall footballing philosophy with a keen emphasis on our development and academy set-ups."
“...build a footballing infrastructure which will help us achieve our long-term ambitions.”
In basic english - HE HAS LONG TERM GOALS, HE IS NOT HERE TO IMMEDIATELY IMPROVE THE FIRST TEAM and has now had 10 days of a transfer window where he can start to show some short term results and we've made what is considered by most to be a good signing in Jim O'Brien, I imagine people that dislike Paul Hart will say he had absolutely nothing to do with that despite the fact that Ardley has said on multiple occasions he's sat down with Neil Cox AND Paul Hart to discuss the transfer window...
Ardley said that he had the same agent as Jim O'Brien.
“We know him through my agent and several players who have played with him as well.
https://www.nottinghampost.com/sport...en-add-2405494