Will VAR be used live to review contentious decisions like the recent Morelos fiasco or will it only be used review goals and penalties etc?
Unfortunatley VAR is only for wrongly awarded goals(offsides/fouls) straight reds, mistaken identity and pens
So the Moronos stuff can still happen. Our corrupt leaders will still get away with their crap
It eliminates human error supposedly. But "human error" is a very vague term. If the ref deems his mistake to stand then it stands. Its all about opinion rather than the actual rules of the game
VAR is not that great really.
An expense a poor(financially) league does not need
Last edited by Pacman1903; 18-01-2019 at 10:34 AM.
That's what I thought. To the best of my knowledge the meeting in Perth last night was to address the issues regarding refereeing and compliance officer decisions. I do not see what difference introducing VAR will make to the corrupt officials running or refereeing our game.
Just have the decision making officials from a different country, based in a different country.
St Etienne v Lyon tonight.
First minute, St Etienne should have had a penalty. Stonewaller.
Didnt even go to VAR. So whats the point in it. If the guy watching VAR is a moron then there will still be f@ck ups galore
Keep it out of Scottish fitba. We are riddled with morons. VAR wont solve that
VAR would solve it if it was a challenge based system like tennis. 2 challenges per half, which must be made by the manager. Challenges should be for e erything. Also it means you don't 2 or 3 video refs looking at footage constantly. One at the side of the pitch will do.