Thanks for the kind words Roly, much appreciated, don't worry about owt howdy says, he's a two bit bully and troll, notice how he never ever posts owt apart from when he wants to abuse me??
Bit sad really, dread to think what his home life is like but heyho, each to their own eh.
So let's get this straight. When you use whataboutery, it's an acceptable diversion but when anyone else uses whataboutery it's a diversion from an argument?
Wrong. Just wrong. In all cases it is an attempt to deflect an argument away from the original point onto one which you would like to make, which is why you deflected Red's point onto Abbott. Why did you feel the need to bring Abbott into it?
Just accept it and stop wriggling you hypocrite. You're embarrassing yourself.
Very true, his mates grist and gf lap it up though don't they....
You are still confused. The diversion was Red's reference to Grayling.
I dealt with Grayling - there was no diversion. You diverted from anti-Semitism in Labour - adopting the same head in the sand approach that the party is. Own it. I know which is wrong.
P.s. Calm down. You will do yourself a mischief. It’s only a message board.
Sighs.
OK, let's break it down.
1. Wasn't Reds point about Greyling, a Conservative minister? Y/
2. Having commented on Grayling, did you then change the topic to Abbott, a Labour MP? Y/N
As I've said before, happy to engage with you on any topic. Just be a dear and answer my questions first. Clear the decks so to speak.
P. S. Awful attempt to lick Red's arse by the way. Utterly cringe worthy!