They can win. What they did here was say something, while also saying nothing. All in management speak too, which makes most normal folk automatically think they’re dealing with bell ends.
The club can’t win.
They say nothing & folk moan.
They do this & folk moan.
Folk are seeing the word “challenger” and assuming the worst.
They define that as “striving to punch above our weight”.
The bottom line is most fans judge the club on their transfer policy and the success of it, & how that translates on to performances on the pitch.
They can win. What they did here was say something, while also saying nothing. All in management speak too, which makes most normal folk automatically think they’re dealing with bell ends.
Redscot summed it up
Utter w@nkery.
Aye, we've got to remember the money the challenger brand has spent on players such as big Sammy Cosgrove from Carlisle United.. 20 grand, whoopty-f@cking-do...
This is what I thought of when I saw the term ‘Challenger’. 🙁 I fear such bland managerialist pish, once defined, may serve to result in a similar, if less tragic, outcome.
https://youtu.be/j4JOjcDFtBE
Actually the most revealing aspect of this is their signatures. - if you're interested in graphology.
Most of them are pretty run of the mill with the (worrying)exception of the manager & his assistant,
Both McInnes & Docherty present to the viewer the unmistakable characteristic showing that they are a bit full of themselves.
The financial manager leaves too large a gap in middle , means is a bit shifty - which you'd expect from a financial person.