If Bojo gets this deal through he will go down in the history books forever as "The man who saved Britain" .Go Bojo go
Could I ask the same question as army BT, it seems more than coincidence that you've followed her out of the door. I don't know Louise Ellman, but I've known of her since Mrs S used to have meetings with her when she was on the LCC Education Committee a long time ago, I've followed her career with interest ever since, she must have been a Labour Party member as long as you, and coming from over your way I'm sure you must know her.
I have to agree with army as well, it's a shame that you've felt it necessary to leave, we can often be miles apart on politics, but I recognise a good, decent Labour man when I see one, and it's an ominously sad day for the Labour Movement when people like you and Louise Ellman feel it's time to walk away.
Well BT I know it must have been a wrench for you to leave the Labour Party but you can’t say your colleagues on this board didn’t try to warn you what was happening. The influence of Momentum over all matters and I can see local loyal activists being passed over in the selection progress as Parliamentary Labour candidates in favour of Corbyn acolytes. The lack of any rapport between Labour at council level and the electorate. Radcliffe West is neither the start nor the end. Hope happier days lie ahead for you in the SEP.
BT: I would say you have been holding on to a philosophy ,not understanding the the real nature of the world. Equality can never be! No two atoms are the same. No shame , Marx also did not fully understand the human psychic,otherwise his social-economic theory would have lasted even today.An example of a social economic society can be found in the Israeli Kibutz, a society that has mostly failed, in it's social-economic experiment.
What would it mean to create a society with income equality? This is a burning political and social question today as we look at our world where fewer and fewer people hold a larger and larger part of the economic pie. But it’s also something that we can look to Jewish history to try to understand
KIbbutzim, communities in Israel that were based for many years on full income equality, in the distribution of incomes among members, and on collective ownership of property, were, as you said, indeed always a small percentage of the Israeli society.We can note, that kibbutzim are more interesting social experiments in voluntary socialism and equal sharing, and they teach us about the conditions under which voluntary socialism and income inequality or income equality can succeed and when it will fail, and so on.
But today the failure of the kibbutzim cannot be ascribed to lack of ideological fervour, inadequate resources, or hostility from the surrounding "capitalist" society. Despite these advantages, kibbutzim failed to achieve a high level of economic productivity, and even failed to retain the loyalty of many of their own members. Over time, many kibbutz residents became frustrated with the perverse incentives created by socialism, and many also yearned for the individual freedom and privacy created by private property rights.
As someone wrote '' I became even more fascinated and liked the kibbutz even more because this idea of a society that shares everything equally and treats everybody the same and where weak members are getting an equal share of the total pie seemed like a virtuous and right way to construct society.
"Equality can never be!"
I believe our society should strive for equality, the same equality espoused by the glorious Margaret Thatcher, equality of opportunity, what each individual does with that opportunity is up to them.