Originally Posted by
Don_Corleone
I would rather we weren't man marking the oppositions right back. I would prefer us to play a winger on the wing so that we have an outlet and so that the opposition right back might have to do some defending during the 90 minutes. I would rather have had Ferguson in the centre where he can actually influence the game.
Striker on the wing... nope I wouldn't have dropped Cosgrove to play Wilson up front. I would've played a winger on the wing and had Wilson on the bench. I like Wilson, but he's a pointless signing unless he's going to be played alongside Cosgrove, which he never will be. No point playing him on the wing and asking him to basically be a back up full back.
Formation wise - I probably would have gone 4231 yes, but if the idea was going to be to let them have the ball all the time and just punt it desperately any time we got it, we'd have been as well playing 442 and putting Main up front with Cosgrove to increase the likelihood of someone getting near the punts.
What really annoyed me was McKenna and Lewis after match interview with that dumbo from RedTV - they were talking as if it was a great performance, how Celtic hardly troubled us, none of their shots were threatening, we were composed on the ball, we caused them problems etc. Totally deluded. We got absolutely and utterly overran and it could've been a total embarrassment of a scoreline on another day.