Reply With QuoteThere’s the problem & the reason she can’t winOriginally Posted by InversneckieDob
Hall Of Fame
It seems we've missed our chance to get out from under Westminster, sad really.
Still, if Kate Forbes really is someone who can lead Scotland to independence, well and good.
I'd vote for the objectionable free church, weirdo bigot.
As long as the checks and balances kept all her outlandish, superstitious sh1te away from policy, fair do's.
Hall Of Fame
There’s the problem & the reason she can’t win
Hall Of Fame
Muslins don't have any superstitious shïte then?
Hall Of Fame
Of course they do.
What's your point?
Hall Of Fame
It wasn't my point it was yours.
Anyway it's obvious that the SNP have little or no interest in winning the next election.
Perhaps it's some sort of longer term ploy but I wouldn't count on it.
Yes we've missed our chance, I won't ever see an independent Scotland and I very much doubt you will either.
Hall Of Fame
Eh?
Hall Of Fame
You brought religion into it.
I agree, we would be better off without it.
Hall Of Fame
Well, yes.
But the broader point, regarding her specifically, is that a lot of the looney fringe view her mob espouse are viewed as acceptable in some "socially conservative" circles.
I'd hope, were a Forbes leadership to come to pass, this nonsense would be reigned in.
I'd similarly hope, and I'd also think it more likely, that if the current incumbent FM tried to introduce, say, Sharia Law, the checks and balances would kick in.
Hall Of Fame
Weirdo middle eastern religions, the pair of them.
However, if you run a party looking for votes, you don't choose the religion deemed to be foreign.
That's not taking into account his appalling weegieness, which may well turn out to be the biggest factor.
Hall Of Fame
Just a small point of order. He didn’t choose his religion, she did
Posting Permissions