+ Visit Rotherham United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 42

Thread: Premier League to vote on scrapping VAR

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    8,244
    Quote Originally Posted by caytonmiller View Post
    We haven't had var in the championship but fans are moaning every week about the ref....
    Var is a great piece of technology and need developing even further so refs/linesman can be eliminated from the game all together...
    That hasn't happened in any other sport that uses technology extensively so why should it happen in football?

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    4,026
    Quote Originally Posted by mellowmiller View Post
    The biggest flaw in the "offside by a toenail argument" is that no-one in authority is prepared to confirm that the technology is absolutely and utterly capable without a shadow of doubt able to capture the exact millisecond when the ball was played......and yet a player can be offside by a whisker.
    So we don't really know if these marginal decisions are actually correct anyway.
    Whilst I agree with your analysis of even technology not being able to capture the exact millisecond when the ball was played, it will still be a damn sight more accurate than a human being. UTM

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    1,319
    Quote Originally Posted by mellowmiller View Post
    The biggest flaw in the "offside by a toenail argument" is that no-one in authority is prepared to confirm that the technology is absolutely and utterly capable without a shadow of doubt able to capture the exact millisecond when the ball was played......and yet a player can be offside by a whisker.
    So we don't really know if these marginal decisions are actually correct anyway.
    That's a really good point Mellow. Everything is focused to the line but no one seems to care about the accuracy of the boot coming into contact with the ball. Its a bit like trying to judge a push shot at snooker from 75 yards away at high speed!

  4. #34
    Quote Originally Posted by mellowmiller View Post
    The biggest flaw in the "offside by a toenail argument" is that no-one in authority is prepared to confirm that the technology is absolutely and utterly capable without a shadow of doubt able to capture the exact millisecond when the ball was played......and yet a player can be offside by a whisker.
    So we don't really know if these marginal decisions are actually correct anyway.
    Yes Mellow everything that is measured or capable of being measured has a margin of error in that measurement. The trick is in deciding if that error is significant in what's being measured.

    Goal posts for example have to be a certain height but if a set of posts were 1 mm too high would anybody notice ( or care). What would you use to measure them anyway? A tape measure or a NASA grade laser locator? One is good enough, the other is overkill.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    12,471
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy Badfellow View Post
    That's a really good point Mellow. Everything is focused to the line but no one seems to care about the accuracy of the boot coming into contact with the ball. Its a bit like trying to judge a push shot at snooker from 75 yards away at high speed!
    Still better than a refs eye

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    12,471
    Quote Originally Posted by mellowmiller View Post
    That hasn't happened in any other sport that uses technology extensively so why should it happen in football?
    They never put a man on the moon until the technology was available.. oh wait. Or did they?.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    47,661
    Quote Originally Posted by caytonmiller View Post
    They never put a man on the moon until the technology was available.. oh wait. Or did they?.
    No they didn’t but the Yanks are scurrying to try once again to get there first so as to place some old tattered worn flag somewhere with a few footprints thrown in for good measure to say they’ve found proof of previous missions.

    Cue all the true believers 🤣 tin hat on already

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    11,393
    Quote Originally Posted by Brin View Post
    No they didn’t but the Yanks are scurrying to try once again to get there first so as to place some old tattered worn flag somewhere with a few footprints thrown in for good measure to say they’ve found proof of previous missions.

    Cue all the true believers �� tin hat on already
    Well said Mr B . The voice of reason
    You don’t need a tin hat for writing the truth

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    8,244
    Quote Originally Posted by caytonmiller View Post
    They never put a man on the moon until the technology was available.. oh wait. Or did they?.
    Rugby, tennis, cricket......all have had the technology for years but the referees, umpires and line judges are still there. Perhaps they're waiting for them to go to the moon?

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    4,882
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy Badfellow View Post
    That's a really good point Mellow. Everything is focused to the line but no one seems to care about the accuracy of the boot coming into contact with the ball. Its a bit like trying to judge a push shot at snooker from 75 yards away at high speed!
    I used to have a beer with a linesman from the early days of the Premiership. he said they watch the player and listen for the "thump" of the ball. Still not an exact science, but probably the best way to measure it. As long as everyone stuck to it.

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •