f*cking hell i'm f*cked if they ever read the jokes threads
I wonder if I've ever hotlinked.😱😕
f*cking hell i'm f*cked if they ever read the jokes threads
The reports of the demise of Side Before Self (LUFCChat) have been a we bit premature. It has not ceased,,,nearly did,,,but it is still there.
Always rely on the boys on Mad to talk *******s
Phoney ? Says the man naming himself after a fictional secret agent
You silly ****ers don't know the meaning of the word, any of you ever go to games ?
Shame you don't grow up, if people on here and yes Chat, grew up, we might survive the onslaught on **** social media like ****book that's killing off proper football forums
Fair points 'Priest .......... according to GK it's acceptable to abuse a woman,abuse you as a loyal South Stand season ticket holder who attends games with family and feels the urge to attack other Leeds Forum members with past connections to the once 'naughty boys' who now themselves have to listen what 'Mum' tells 'em Forum content wise........... or else ! (http://www.leedssc.org.uk) ........
Yep,it's good to have fans who denounce past demeanours ...
Bullets in the head etc - NOT acceptable either but move on folks,IMO, and banter away ................
...a shame that some on Forums resort to behaviour that belongs to an age long gone.ALAW ?
MOT
Gill you know the thing about 'abuse a woman'?
I don't know what you're referring to specifically, but did he use words that were specifically abusive in gender terms?
Cos if not (and as i say, i don't know exactly what words you're referring to), isn't it better described in non-gender terms? Just 'abuse', if that's what you think it is?
Because if you describe it in gender terms, if it's clearly not done in that way, it means you're accusing him of something, and therefore you could be construed as being gender abusive because he's male and you're female.
Others might call that approach 'using the gender card', but i don't know what you're referring to, and as such would need to know that and might totally agree with you if you provide the quote.
What was it that was actually said that was gender specifically abusive?