Darren Moore

[Grist_To_The_Mill]

By that reasoning Warne should be an attacking manager

Why?

Warne was more of a winger/midfielder that scored very few goals and rarely got involved with defensive duties.

Which goes a long way to explain why he favoured players like Taylor and Newell, plays 4-5-1 so we don’t score many and we have a leaky defence.

[frogmiller]

Why?

Warne was more of a winger/midfielder that scored very few goals and rarely got involved with defensive duties.

Which goes a long way to explain why he favoured players like Taylor and Newell, plays 4-5-1 so we don’t score many and we have a leaky defence.

I don't think that the leaky defence was a part of the plan

Edit: I do think that he wanted more throw ins though! Warne was the champion at winning throw ins.

[mikemiller]

Warney may go for a more attacking style in this division, after the unsuccessful 4-5-1 last year. (Still needs to sort the defence out though).
Darren Moore might decide to do the same.

[flourbasher]

He's the guy who accused rufc fans of calling him monkey at Millmoor when playing for wba.

In reality we were giving encouragement to Andy Monkhouse.

I think he apologized in the press later that week

Yes it's a good appointment for them

[ilikecarling]

I talk to a Baggies season ticket holder quite regularly at work and he did say that the standard of football under Darren Moore was soul destroying....relatively effective, but boring.

Really? Wow they were the best team I saw at nys last season going forad when they destroyed us around Christmas In fact that game a thought they were the best team we played all season.

[mikemiller]

Really? Wow they were the best team I saw at nys last season going forad when they destroyed us around Christmas In fact that game a thought they were the best team we played all season.

Same here, but they might not have attacked so much when they played top-six opponents, or maybe they ran out of steam near the end of the season?