dfcss/the open letter door kicker in's, here's one for you

[islaydarkblue]

Disagree bcram, they are not representing their members views and in all honesty that should be a resigning matter

I agree that they are not representing their members views and they should be considering their position as a Dee4life director.

[islaydarkblue]

Surely the logic of the answers that Islay asks is that whoever they put forward was not accepted by the majority shareholder? Would the Dee4life membership want to spend money on trying to have the these issues settled in court? I think not but I may be wrong.
The real damage is the failure to deliver any communications that show talking quietly is working. I support this principle and believe whatever happens it will be helpful to have an organisation like Dee4life.

They should have told the Dee4life members the answer they received when they put forward their nominated person to be the Dee4life Primary representative.