No I wasn't.
The biggest factor stopping that would be freedom of movement.
All this talk of economics is fine, but Brexit it deeper than that.
The biggest squealers from MP's, business leaders and celebrities are multi millionaires. They don't suffer bog all from the downside of membership.
Pressure on low paid jobs/housing/services/crime etc.
So those two models would never satisfy the average leaver.
What I did say was, "is why do you have to be in a political union, to have free movement of goods?"
When we joined, we was sold a common market model. Y/N?
Was a drive for a superstate ever mentioned Y/N?
Was no borders/ monetary unions/ an army/ removal of sovereignty/ our laws changed ever mentioned? Y/N?
The EU has slowly gripped Europe in a vice of control, as it leeched into every crack of society.
I know what the ballot paper said BFP.
It said leave or remain.
Of the two I chose leave.
We have all heard the promises made by politicians. It's a pity some of them can't look in a mirror and realise they are obligated to implement them.
I'm not fully against her deal.
I don't like the small print keeping us trapped in the single market.
OUT WAS OUT. No ifs, no buts.
We are not leaving Europe, we are leaving the EU.
A sensible trade deal is preferred. But not to satisfy EU desires of control.
I'm not even against freedom of movement.
What I'd compromise with, would be that you can come here.
But you will get no benefits/housing/free medical/free education/ claiming for family members who aren't even in the country for five years. I'd expect this to apply to any Brit abroad as well.
This will sort out the surge in low paid free loaders and if you are here, you have no choice but to work.
It's the poor here that feel neglected and need support first.
If you can pay your way and provide us with your skills, you're very welcome.
After all, this is supposed to be the way it is around the world.