Originally Posted by
the_anticlough
Yeah, the two main parties would likely smash to smithereens pretty quickly. That'd be a positive thing!
You'd probably get a couple of decades of centrifugal fracturing before parties began to combine and consolidate again. For me though, it's firstly about guaranteeing a voice, platform and place for the radical ideas the country desperately needs. Suppression of alternatives is one of main aims/outcomes of the current Westminster, business and finance-based system.
It'd be quite unpredictable. Projecting outcomes is interesting, but that misses the point really. You change the voting system because it's the right and fair thing to do.
Imagine devising a political system for a new country from scratch. Erm...What shall we do...
A) Let everyone vote and then have a forum of representatives in proportion to that vote...or
B ) Have a vote and then give disproportionately high representation and unlimited power to one and zero to others...