Originally Posted by
FatherKnowsBest
When we talk about backing Wilder, how much are we talking about, how much is enough? How many do we need? Are we sure that those funds aren't being made available, and if not why not? Of course we don't. Its all supposition and opinion, largely along our historical lines of prejudice around the board and McCabe in particular.
I accept that the squad is a bit threadbare and that is kind of the point I'm trying to make. The foundations for us to go straight up aren't there, they were never there. That's not to say its impossible but we're well into the season now. Can one or two players have the impact to get our momentum going again. We've seen how Lundstram struggled to get up to speed and he's done all the training since pre-season. I'm guessing our rivals will also be spending, and they have better depth of squads than we do already, or did we think we could strengthen and no-one would notice? So i'm not against, but I don't think that there are quite the grounds for going full on 'gung-ho'.
Taking risks is all part of making decisions, but there is a point where 'risk' becomes 'risky' . I've not yet seen anyone talk about what happens if the Directors chuck a big chunk of change in, spend the Brooks money before we have it, maybe commit money we'd spend in the summer transfer window, and then we go and finish 7th. If we have a plan, we should think twice about chucking the plan away.
If Paul Coutts had been able to ride the challenge and we'd taken another 15 points from the last 10 games, then it would have been a different proposition for me. But he didn't and as well as we're playing (now and again), one win in nine is a dreadful run which underlines the point that we haven't got the squad depth to really compete for promotion. I really don't think its 'now or never'. We're on an upward journey and if it isn't now it will be soon. I wish it was different, but that's how I see it.