Problem is that Labour's policies hardly deviate from the Tory ones on so many things. IMO, anybody expecting a more social society under Starmer would be extremely disappointed.
Problem is that Labour's policies hardly deviate from the Tory ones on so many things. IMO, anybody expecting a more social society under Starmer would be extremely disappointed.
Is it just my perception, the fact that actions are more closely recorded and scrutinised these days or just the ‘quality’ (or otherwise) of MP’s in this day and age that makes me think that the behaviour of our Parliamentary representatives has reached an almost daily new low?
Last edited by ramAnag; 03-11-2023 at 06:24 PM.
I see it as a parallel universe rA - those in the media spotlight are judged by an imagined new set of benchmarks that most of the population (of the world but let’s just stick to U.K. for now) are getting nowhere near and for the most part not even trying to. In this particular case his words are not just illegal but futile, BUT the lines of argument thereafter get very VERY complex. Not sure we want to go there again after previous skirmishes on here
Not looking for a ‘skirmish’, AF.
Sounds as if you’re subscribing to the...they’re as flawed as the rest of us, just more closely scrutinised...argument.
You may be right but I honestly can’t recall at time when their appear to have been as many occasions of politicians routinely indulging in bullying, foul language, harassment, inappropriate behaviour and sheer dishonesty/corruption as is currently the case.
It also appears to coincide with them being utterly useless eg...Covid enquiry, the NHS, HS2, Truss’ impact on the economy, school buildings, migrant crisis etc etc.
Not suggesting YOU were rA
The key word in your comment is 'appear' - it may be (and I think i probably is) that politicians and their henchmen are little different in terms of behaviour than they've ever been, but the spotlight is on them so much more at present, partly through the advent of social media and amateur voice/picture recording and partly through a mure puritan leaning at present
I'm not going to critique performance in each of the areas you mentioned, but the currently most high profile one, Covid, is almost beyond comprehension wrt the behaviour and competence of those we put our trust in. Not sure if you ever watched 'The Thick Of It', but its proved to be a depressingly accurate portrayal of the workings of Government
However, and a ray of hope: My friend's son, the 'ministers bag carrier' (one of those characters I've been accused of making up) observes that governmental behaviour varies by department and he's only worked in places where behaviour has been businesslike (albeit he's a bit more guarded about competence!). I found the same through decades working in big offices, group behaviour could be drastically different in groups seperated by nothing more than a set of swing doors
I do think there is a trend to judge people in the public eye by a stricter set of standards.
I think 'Party Gate' is a good example, a close friend of mine is the 1st to get on his soapbox about it, but he was the worst person i knew for following rules, parties and gatherings at home, refusal to wear face masks, false mobile numbers on track and trace, or just flash his phone but not actually have bluetooth on and so on.
His argument is that its different because he didnt set the rules, and i sort of understand that to a degree, but also think there is a huge element of people in glass houses....
But..people in the public eye choose to be there and know they are scrutinised, and its not new its just probably more visible these days, so if you want to be in the public eye you have to accept this is going to happen.
The Gordon Brown one when he went off on one about that woman when he didnt realise his mic was still on, how many of us would have probably said something similar behind closed doors, just that we wouldnt be on mic, or if we were no one would care, but he was PM so tacitly expected to have different standards i guess.