Originally Posted by
PedroTheFisherman66
Evening Laddo
I didn't want to go into endless details about mangers and AH but let me dissect this bit by bit as you have asked.
Nolan was and should have been sacked , he had a woeful preseason and the squad he assembled proved to be a DUD one, seeing as they got us relegated can there be any argument about this?
He wasn't sacked on the basis of losing at the start of the season it was also based on the poor form from the end of the season before.
However looking at the start of the season we were losing by four goals a game and getting played of the park. The game we drew at home0-0 (Stevenage I think) we should have lost 5 - 0.
Yeovil came down the lane and played us of the park and beat us by four ( or was it more ) How can a manger have got it so wrong with his pre season signings and then want to have another go after half a dozen games ..
then comes HK of course he was wrong to sack him , he didn't even have a transfer window to operate in yet still managed to get us playing better with the underperforming troop that KN put together.
AH then appointed NA which on paper looked a good appointment , it certainly wasn't along the lines of the Fullerton appointment, he put his faith and money in NA which went unrewarded.
yes you can blame AH for the appointment , but ultimately it was NA who built the team that took us down and he implemented the style of play that took us there, negative lets not get beaten (even though we needed to win) cautious beyond belief.
Looking back you could perhaps under stand that maybe the pressure of defeat was immense hence the tactics employed.
But has he learnt from this , well judging by his continued style , NO !
Again returning to AH stewardship , yes he was good for the club where he indeed raised the profile and gates but lets not forget he nearly ruined the club financially.
Yes we can blame him all day long for this , but we cant and shouldn't blame him for the way the Team played and the tactics employed.
This is nailed on the managers fault , never mind what was going on behind the scenes the manager picks the team trains the players and makes crucial decisions in the 90 minutes or so during a game , simple.
He lives or dies by this, whatever the obstacles put in his way are there for him to deal with.
one last point , could you please point out for me any of the occasions that AH gave a penalty away , scored an own goal , left his man unmarked at the back post for a tap in , missed a penalty , put one wide when through one on one with the keeper or got sent off leaving us defend 70 minutes with 10 men ????
Yes AH picked and sacked the managers , but KN and NA had more than enough support & time to have been a success rather than the disappointment's they are and were,