voyeurism.

[trickydick]

I have noticed these voyeuristic lurkers on some threads on here.
Very creepy

[Newcy Wolf]

I have noticed these voyeuristic lurkers on some threads on here.
Very creepy

I've got a potential answer to your obsession with post numbers/counts. Certainly nothing creepy about it.



Maybe, just maybe it's because your typical footymad follower might look on here, read the posts, then decide, nah, I'm not interested in this little clique. FAO X, FAO Y, FAO Z......ad infinitum....

All the best

[gaz1959]

[gaz1959]

I've got a potential answer to your obsession with post numbers/counts. Certainly nothing creepy about it.



Maybe, just maybe it's because your typical footymad follower might look on here, read the posts, then decide, nah, I'm not interested in this little clique. FAO X, FAO Y, FAO Z......ad infinitum....

All the best

There's no clique here

[Newcy Wolf]

Yep.

I'm talking to you...

[Newcy Wolf]

There's no clique here

Ok.

Maybe I'm TOTALLY wrong.

But when you see a forum page with................

FAO ALF
FAO TRICKY
FAO DAVEY
FAO GAZ

it looks a bit like a creepy 'all in'.

I don't think you have lurkers, there may be people looking and laughing.

[gaz1959]

Are you
1) pissed
2) on a wind up
3) got a real beef with this forum?

I personally don't know you very well but I'm glad of your visits

[gaz1959]

I rarely get FAO's for me but I get your point as I don't like them either as when you see them you feel a temptation to look then when you look you may feel a temptation to reply BUT it's a FAO post so you don't

Good point Wolf

[Newcy Wolf]

Are you
1) pissed
2) on a wind up
3) got a real beef with this forum?

I personally don't know you very well but I'm glad of your visits

None of them.

I've just said what I saw-all this business of lurkers is ridiculous, people read and choose whether to post or not.
The fact that so many have read the threads on this forum but have chosen not to post doesn't make them lurkers, it may be a sign that they can't be bothered? Maybe?

Like I said,all the best, no malice intended.

[gaz1959]

None of them.

I've just said what I saw-all this business of lurkers is ridiculous, people read and choose whether to post or not.
The fact that so many have read the threads on this forum but have chosen not to post doesn't make them lurkers, it may be a sign that they can't be bothered? Maybe?

Like I said,all the best, no malice intended.

None taken but I do take your point.

Feel free to pop in and post anyways.

Quite often my posts get unanswered ( I guess that says something about me tho)