O/T Jeremy corbyn

[ragingpup]

The description of the right wingers involved could get really fruity if commies and Marxists are used....Fascist *******s perhaps because the next tory leader should fit nicely into such a regime.....get the army out and start building walls - hang all the alleged bad people and drown those on the dole....then fat people perhaps....

Ssshhh. Don't give them ideas!

[gm_gm]

I have just read a tweet from Lord Sugar publicly backing Borris Johnson. He says that it's the only way to stop Jeremy Corbyn winning the next election.

This tweet was challenged by someone who had pointed out to Lord Sugar that only a few weeks ago he had stood in the Houses of Lords and asked for Borris to be jailed for lying to the public during the refferendum.

Isn't it a shame that Labour peers will do anything to stop Corbyn?

I think Corbyn and his daft pal McDoughnut would bankrupt the economy within 18 months, and all these people who know feck all spouting "I must have a deal with the EU, I need a deal" wont know whats hit them

[John2]

I think Corbyn and his daft pal McDoughnut would bankrupt the economy within 18 months, and all these people who know feck all spouting "I must have a deal with the EU, I need a deal" wont know whats hit them

I don't think you understand politics that well.

But indulge me, what policies do you think a Corbyn led government could actually get through parliament (assume a majority of 30) that would do such damage?

Let's see if you can produce a remotely viable policy that would bankrupt the country or if it's just a bit of cheap brainless bluster.

[animallittle3]

I think Corbyn and his daft pal McDoughnut would bankrupt the economy within 18 months, and all these people who know feck all spouting "I must have a deal with the EU, I need a deal" wont know whats hit them

Amazing post given that the industry you work in and trumpet went bankrupt and only survived because the government of the day adopted a socialist approach .

[Grist_To_The_Mill]

In the U.K. we have a professional, highly efficient security service that analyses risks both home and abroad. The information they obtain is used to brief the Prime Minster and selected MPs.

By their analysis they said the Russians were behind the novochok attacks in Salisbury, Corbyn didn’t believe them.

By their analysis they said that Iran was responsible for the recent tanker bombings in the gulf of Hormuz , Corbyn didn’t believe them.

Would you really want that man as PM?

[ragingpup]

In the U.K. we have a professional, highly efficient security service that analyses risks both home and abroad. The information they obtain is used to brief the Prime Minster and selected MPs.

By their analysis they said the Russians were behind the novochok attacks in Salisbury, Corbyn didn’t believe them.

By their analysis they said that Iran was responsible for the recent tanker bombings in the gulf of Hormuz , Corbyn didn’t believe them.

Would you really want that man as PM?

I take it you believed Blair and his "weapons of mass destruction'? Corbyn didn't and voted against. Shame we believed Blair as if we'd called him out we could have saved many British lives.

[John2]

There are many things that I will not defend Corbyn about, but you're wrong here.

By their analysis they said the Russians were behind the novochok attacks in Salisbury, Corbyn didn’t believe them.

That's not an accurate analysis. He never challenged whether it was the Russians, he just (reasonably) asked what new evidence we had after pointing the finger, given our intelligence services initially suggested it was either the Russian state or disgruntled operatives.

By their analysis they said that Iran was responsible for the recent tanker bombings in the gulf of Hormuz , Corbyn didn’t believe them.

Again, Corbyn has asked for evidence, NOT the same as not believing they did it. The EU is also advising caution before we have more evidence.

We live in strange times, I used to trust the US on issues like this, but Trump's lack of integrity and willingness to lie combined with his hostile stance towards Iran mean that I'd now demand a higher standard of evidence from the Americans than in the past.

Asking for evidence is not the same as not believing, asking for evidence is not something to be condemned, ever.

[Exiletyke]

I very rarely agree with the way Corbyn goes about his business &
I have to say John that I totally endorse your comments
I recently jumped to the conclusion that Barton was guilty of assault on Stendel at Oakwell
I still believe he is guilty but will wait for the Authorities to sort it ........if I live that long

[ragingpup]

There are many things that I will not defend Corbyn about, but you're wrong here.



That's not an accurate analysis. He never challenged whether it was the Russians, he just (reasonably) asked what new evidence we had after pointing the finger, given our intelligence services initially suggested it was either the Russian state or disgruntled operatives.



Again, Corbyn has asked for evidence, NOT the same as not believing they did it. The EU is also advising caution before we have more evidence.

We live in strange times, I used to trust the US on issues like this, but Trump's lack of integrity and willingness to lie combined with his hostile stance towards Iran mean that I'd now demand a higher standard of evidence from the Americans than in the past.

Asking for evidence is not the same as not believing, asking for evidence is not something to be condemned, ever.

Surprised that you ever trusted the US on issues like this John. Not sure they ever really earned any more trust than other international big stagers that we mistrust.

[Pattylallacks2]

Didn't like him much when he was in "Gavin and Stacey" and can't stand him since he moved to the States.