+ Visit Newcastle United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: so if the inbreds are worth 40 mill

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    8,758

    so if the inbreds are worth 40 mill

    ashly 350 -400 mill doesnt seem far off

    cost of the squad alone
    premier league money

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    46,558
    The deal to buy Sunderland has gone through.

    The new owners holding a press conference on Monday afternoon to give the media and Sunderland fans more details on the takeover.

    It has been revealed that the much maligned Ellis Short has actually taken care of the massive debts owed by the club, allowing the £40m purchase to go through.

    Interestingly, the new owners have given details of how the actual paying for it will happen.

    Sunderland fans have been keen to speculate that the non-league Eastleigh owner Stewart Donald was just a front for far bigger players in the background.

    The Mackems wanting to believe that the shareholders would include very rich individuals who could quickly solve many of their problems.

    However, at the press conference today, Stewart Donald has made clear that he is indeed the majority shareholder whatever happens.

    As for paying for the deal, this is going to be painful for Sunderland fans.

    As Stewart Donald and minority shareholder Charlie Methven have revealed that they couldn’t afford to pay the £40m up front for Sunderland.

    Instead they have been given two years to pay the money.

    On top of that, the new owners were forced to admit that the £40m takeover on credit isn’t secured against any of their own assets, instead it has been secured against the club’s parachute payments over the course of the next two years.

    After receiving £41m this past (2017/18) season, Sunderland (Stewart Donald and his co-shareholders) will receive in excess of £40m in Premier League parachute payments over the course of the next two years.

    The vision Sunderland fans had of mega-rich new owners taking over, is quickly falling apart.

    If they continued to struggle, you would have to question the ability of the new owners to be able to fund Sunderland.

    They may succeed in cutting the wage bill to an extent this summer but it will surely be still far in excess of anybody else in that division.

    Plus, after gates plummeted to as low as fif**** thousand actually turning up at the Stadium of Light in the second half of last season, it remains to be seen what kind of support there will be in the third tier, especially if they start badly.

    When asked about a transfer budget, Stewart Donald claimed it would be ‘pretty hefty by League One standards’ and ‘there will be transfer fees involved in the players we bring in.’


    Bit awkward if true and if it is true, they are relying on going straight back up it would appear?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    12,105
    Quote Originally Posted by Jammy89 View Post
    The deal to buy Sunderland has gone through.

    The new owners holding a press conference on Monday afternoon to give the media and Sunderland fans more details on the takeover.

    It has been revealed that the much maligned Ellis Short has actually taken care of the massive debts owed by the club, allowing the £40m purchase to go through.

    Interestingly, the new owners have given details of how the actual paying for it will happen.

    Sunderland fans have been keen to speculate that the non-league Eastleigh owner Stewart Donald was just a front for far bigger players in the background.

    The Mackems wanting to believe that the shareholders would include very rich individuals who could quickly solve many of their problems.

    However, at the press conference today, Stewart Donald has made clear that he is indeed the majority shareholder whatever happens.

    As for paying for the deal, this is going to be painful for Sunderland fans.

    As Stewart Donald and minority shareholder Charlie Methven have revealed that they couldn’t afford to pay the £40m up front for Sunderland.

    Instead they have been given two years to pay the money.

    On top of that, the new owners were forced to admit that the £40m takeover on credit isn’t secured against any of their own assets, instead it has been secured against the club’s parachute payments over the course of the next two years.

    After receiving £41m this past (2017/18) season, Sunderland (Stewart Donald and his co-shareholders) will receive in excess of £40m in Premier League parachute payments over the course of the next two years.

    The vision Sunderland fans had of mega-rich new owners taking over, is quickly falling apart.

    If they continued to struggle, you would have to question the ability of the new owners to be able to fund Sunderland.

    They may succeed in cutting the wage bill to an extent this summer but it will surely be still far in excess of anybody else in that division.

    Plus, after gates plummeted to as low as fif**** thousand actually turning up at the Stadium of Light in the second half of last season, it remains to be seen what kind of support there will be in the third tier, especially if they start badly.

    When asked about a transfer budget, Stewart Donald claimed it would be ‘pretty hefty by League One standards’ and ‘there will be transfer fees involved in the players we bring in.’


    Bit awkward if true and if it is true, they are relying on going straight back up it would appear?
    It is true, it is!!!!...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    25,891
    Ironic that the report metions "support in the third tier"

    They won;t even have support in the second tier, man...they've closed it.

    The Bungalow of Light.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,770
    Quote Originally Posted by Zippity View Post
    Ironic that the report metions "support in the third tier"

    They won;t even have support in the second tier, man...they've closed it.

    The Bungalow of Light.
    Are you trying to be humourous zipp??

    I took it to mean 3rd division football or am I wrong?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    15,686
    That must be bitter reading for the mackems.
    ������

    With some decent appointments they should get to the fizzy at the first or second attempt but, if that article is true, how are they ever going to get back to the PL?

    They're well gone IMO

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    8,758
    a warning to us aswell regards new owners

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    46,558
    Quote Originally Posted by pboromag View Post
    a warning to us aswell regards new owners
    An actual valid call.

    Isn't that what Man Utd's yank owners did as well?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    8,758
    yep and thats how stavely was trying to fund our sale
    but ash wanted it all up front

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,770
    Quote Originally Posted by pboromag View Post
    yep and thats how stavely was trying to fund our sale
    but ash wanted it all up front
    How do you know?????????????!!!!!!!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •