Sevco filth giruy

[Davros1964]

Strange bunch of folk on this thread. They seem to think by ignoring all facts the rubbish they post somehow becomes fact. Facts are both the SPFL and UEFA official websites state Rangers FC remains the same club,SPFL website lists all honours won from the 1800's to the present day and the UEFA website clearly states it's the same club,even listing Rangers European history from the 50's right up to the debacle in Luxembourg. It also gives Rangers an extra co efficient point for winning the ECWC in 1972...not bad going for a club folk on this thread seem to think was formed in 2012. Add to that the European Club Assoc and the Advertising Standards Authority both agreed with the SPFL and UEFA what does this all add up to? Well it adds up to folk on here having no idea about insolvency law or the power of administrators,and it's strange they seem to think it's perfectly ok for clubs such as Hearts (liquidated 1905) Hibs (vanished for over a year then came back as a different Hibs obviously) both claiming honours won by the "old" clubs,and completely ignore clubs such as Leeds Utd (no cva) who are fully acknowledged as the same club...yet the rules are different regards Rangers? Anyone could be forgiven for thinking Rangers were/are the most successful club in Scotland and a lot of folk are desperate to believe otherwise. Fortunately the SPFL SFA and UEFA decide on such matters...not fans of the smaller clubs.

[petermackie]

Strange bunch of folk on this thread. They seem to think by ignoring all facts the rubbish they post somehow becomes fact. Facts are both the SPFL and UEFA official websites state Rangers FC remains the same club,SPFL website lists all honours won from the 1800's to the present day and the UEFA website clearly states it's the same club,even listing Rangers European history from the 50's right up to the debacle in Luxembourg. It also gives Rangers an extra co efficient point for winning the ECWC in 1972...not bad going for a club folk on this thread seem to think was formed in 2012. Add to that the European Club Assoc and the Advertising Standards Authority both agreed with the SPFL and UEFA what does this all add up to? Well it adds up to folk on here having no idea about insolvency law or the power of administrators,and it's strange they seem to think it's perfectly ok for clubs such as Hearts (liquidated 1905) Hibs (vanished for over a year then came back as a different Hibs obviously) both claiming honours won by the "old" clubs,and completely ignore clubs such as Leeds Utd (no cva) who are fully acknowledged as the same club...yet the rules are different regards Rangers? Anyone could be forgiven for thinking Rangers were/are the most successful club in Scotland and a lot of folk are desperate to believe otherwise. Fortunately the SPFL SFA and UEFA decide on such matters...not fans of the smaller clubs.

At least you're no bothered about it 🃏

[shedka]

Anyone could be forgiven for thinking Rangers were/are the most successful club in Scotland

Rangers (rip) are indeed, no one has said otherwise, but a dead club cannot win anymore, so they will at least be that until they are overtaken by Celtic

Sevco however have won no major honours

[shedboy71]

At least you're no bothered about it ��

lol

[RAM1971]

Strange bunch of folk on this thread. They seem to think by ignoring all facts the rubbish they post somehow becomes fact. Facts are both the SPFL and UEFA official websites state Rangers FC remains the same club,SPFL website lists all honours won from the 1800's to the present day and the UEFA website clearly states it's the same club,even listing Rangers European history from the 50's right up to the debacle in Luxembourg. It also gives Rangers an extra co efficient point for winning the ECWC in 1972...not bad going for a club folk on this thread seem to think was formed in 2012. Add to that the European Club Assoc and the Advertising Standards Authority both agreed with the SPFL and UEFA what does this all add up to? Well it adds up to folk on here having no idea about insolvency law or the power of administrators,and it's strange they seem to think it's perfectly ok for clubs such as Hearts (liquidated 1905) Hibs (vanished for over a year then came back as a different Hibs obviously) both claiming honours won by the "old" clubs,and completely ignore clubs such as Leeds Utd (no cva) who are fully acknowledged as the same club...yet the rules are different regards Rangers? Anyone could be forgiven for thinking Rangers were/are the most successful club in Scotland and a lot of folk are desperate to believe otherwise. Fortunately the SPFL SFA and UEFA decide on such matters...not fans of the smaller clubs.

You certainly put up a good argument for 'resurrection' my friend. As always in such cases, some believe, whilst others do not. Usually it's the majority who disbelieve, but that is usually in defiance of the truth.

[weegiearab]

Taken from another page
Some of The Rangers highlights for you ��

Wonder what’s next ������

McCoist as manager,
McCoist on gardening leave,
Kenny McDowall as manager,
McDowall on gardening leave,
Administration,
Having to reapply to join the lower tier,
Ball stuck in hedge,
Same old Alloa always cheating,
3 failed attempts at the Petrofac cup,
Tannadice boycott,
Sandaza prank call,
Where's ra title deeds,
Craig Whyte wealth aff the radar,
Charles Green,
Dallas Cowboys,
The Gazebo at the AGM,
Gangsters in charge,
Hibs 3-2 Rangers,
Hampden Riot,
Lee Wallace is a grass,
Warburton the next England manager,
Bread wrappers for hats,
The gap is closing,
There is no gap,
The Rangers are coming,
Going for 55,
Joey Barton,
5-1 at Celtic Park,
5-1 at Ibrox,
Pitch invasion at Firhill,
Martyn Waghorn fighting with weans outside chip shops,
Warburton getting dragged out of a press conference,
Jim Traynor,
Traynor's press releases,
Warburton resigning/ being sacked,
Pedro Caixinha,
Caixinha's press conferences,
Pedro's mini leagues,
Progres,
Arguing with fans in a hedge,
Carlos Pena,
Dalcio,
Banning green boots,
Dogs and caravans,
Murty,
Headstands,
McInnes is coming home,
Didn't want McInnes anyway,
Chinese bid for Morelos,
Whit's the goalie daein Tam?
4-0 at Hampden,
Captain suspended,
Miller sacked,
Fans chain the gates.....

[JamesMcClean]

Strange bunch of folk on this thread. They seem to think by ignoring all facts the rubbish they post somehow becomes fact. Facts are both the SPFL and UEFA official websites state Rangers FC remains the same club,SPFL website lists all honours won from the 1800's to the present day and the UEFA website clearly states it's the same club,even listing Rangers European history from the 50's right up to the debacle in Luxembourg. It also gives Rangers an extra co efficient point for winning the ECWC in 1972...not bad going for a club folk on this thread seem to think was formed in 2012. Add to that the European Club Assoc and the Advertising Standards Authority both agreed with the SPFL and UEFA what does this all add up to? Well it adds up to folk on here having no idea about insolvency law or the power of administrators,and it's strange they seem to think it's perfectly ok for clubs such as Hearts (liquidated 1905) Hibs (vanished for over a year then came back as a different Hibs obviously) both claiming honours won by the "old" clubs,and completely ignore clubs such as Leeds Utd (no cva) who are fully acknowledged as the same club...yet the rules are different regards Rangers? Anyone could be forgiven for thinking Rangers were/are the most successful club in Scotland and a lot of folk are desperate to believe otherwise. Fortunately the SPFL SFA and UEFA decide on such matters...not fans of the smaller clubs.

Let's have a hypothetical example-

Let's pretend KwikFit go into voluntary liquidation owing millions to Creditors having spent loads of money they didn't have in a vain attempt to keep up with competitors. The very next day, a 'new' Company labelled QuickFit, re-launches , wearing the same uniforms, trading from the same locations and keeping the same motto - 'You Can't Get Quicker than A QuickFit Fitter', all while claiming to have 'served' the public for over 50 years. However, if a creditor cites this 'similarity' and tries to claim the monies owed from previous, he is basically told to get tae phuck as this is actually a 'new' company. So essentially it is a 'Newco' when it suits, yet an 'Oldco' when it also suits. Otherwise called having your cake and eating it and to hell with anybody else. Sound familiar?

Anyway, it wouldn't happen because it is illegal under Company Laws.

Which is why HMRC was, are, and will, remain right on your case.

[shedka]

How disloyal of her majesty

[cybershed]

Strange bunch of folk on this thread. They seem to think by ignoring all facts the rubbish they post somehow becomes fact. Facts are both the SPFL and UEFA official websites state Rangers FC remains the same club,SPFL website lists all honours won from the 1800's to the present day and the UEFA website clearly states it's the same club,even listing Rangers European history from the 50's right up to the debacle in Luxembourg. It also gives Rangers an extra co efficient point for winning the ECWC in 1972...not bad going for a club folk on this thread seem to think was formed in 2012. Add to that the European Club Assoc and the Advertising Standards Authority both agreed with the SPFL and UEFA what does this all add up to? Well it adds up to folk on here having no idea about insolvency law or the power of administrators,and it's strange they seem to think it's perfectly ok for clubs such as Hearts (liquidated 1905) Hibs (vanished for over a year then came back as a different Hibs obviously) both claiming honours won by the "old" clubs,and completely ignore clubs such as Leeds Utd (no cva) who are fully acknowledged as the same club...yet the rules are different regards Rangers? Anyone could be forgiven for thinking Rangers were/are the most successful club in Scotland and a lot of folk are desperate to believe otherwise. Fortunately the SPFL SFA and UEFA decide on such matters...not fans of the smaller clubs.

You're no' Rangers any more. You had to join the league as a new club called 'The Rangers'. You may have the sycophants st the SFA and SPFL on board with your attempt to airbrush the facts from history. But you cannae hoodwink us.

Why are you having a go at the fans of smaller clubs? If it wasnae for pressure from us, Scottish football would've spunked every last morsel of sporting integrity it had in order to parachute your newco into the premier league.

Also worth noting that Celtic also supported the smaller clubs in this. And they are a huge club! Much bigger than your mob. And with a genuine history too.

[RAM1971]

Let's have a hypothetical example-

Let's pretend KwikFit go into voluntary liquidation owing millions to Creditors having spent loads of money they didn't have in a vain attempt to keep up with competitors. The very next day, a 'new' Company labelled QuickFit, re-launches , wearing the same uniforms, trading from the same locations and keeping the same motto - 'You Can't Get Quicker than A QuickFit Fitter', all while claiming to have 'served' the public for over 50 years. However, if a creditor cites this 'similarity' and tries to claim the monies owed from previous, he is basically told to get tae phuck as this is actually a 'new' company. So essentially it is a 'Newco' when it suits, yet an 'Oldco' when it also suits. Otherwise called having your cake and eating it and to hell with anybody else. Sound familiar?

Anyway, it wouldn't happen because it is illegal under Company Laws.

Which is why HMRC was, are, and will, remain right on your case.

I'm getting tyred and exhausted by all this. Good point though!