My point, is very relevant and you know it, hits exactly at the argument you're trying to put out about the prophet.....you see, it's ok for you to go back 3000 yrs to try an prove a weird point, but anyone else does it to counter you then you tell them to move on!! joker.
When the youngest person on this site eventually dies there will still be Islamic terrorism, here and throughout the world. For confirmation of this statement, simply ask the ever helpful, ever knowledgeable Ellis D.
Ellis will tell anyone who wishes to be informed, about the Battle of The Camel which took place on November 7, 656, four years after the death of the pederast Prophet Muhammad. If he is in a benevolent mood, Ellis may take time out to explain the entire history of the warring Sunnis and their firm enemies the Shias.
I suggest that rather than taking up most of Ellis' time you should teach yourself. Ellis clearly has and I wouldn't be in the least surprised if our esteemed colleague knows more, far more than the average Muslim, whatever their persuasion.
Yet another attack tonight in Paris where the perpetrator was 'known' to the security forces.
This is where France has failed in my opinion on this issue, over here we've put plenty of resources into working behind the scenes to counter a lot of this, i don't think France has given it quite the same amount of scrutiny. Having said that, Once these murderers decide to carry out their plans, it is hard to stop from the outset.
If he is actually trying to say I'm a hypocrite, and I'm still not convinced of that, then he clearly is not reading properly. If it was okay for a man to sleep with a twelve year old girl, who HAD reached the age of puberty in 5 BC, it was purely because she had reached an age where she was able to reproduce. Muhammad should NOT have been having *** with a nine year old girl just over six hundred years later, who hadn't yet reached puberty and was therefore unable to reproduce. This made her a child still.
If millmoor or anyone else thinks that is hypocritical, I would seriously have to question their intelligence.
As Zilzal has shown in the past, he clearly has an in depth knowledge of the history of Islam. Aisha's role in the Battle of the Camel is extremely controversial.
If you wish to see the main reason for the divide in Islam between the Shias and the Sunnis, look no further than Aisha. The Sunnis love Aisha and see her as the most important female in Islam.
The Shias have a great dislike of Aisha, they contest that she was Muhammad's favourite wife, they do not like her interference in politics or war. Basically, men's jobs.