Who’s At Fault?

[Devanha Red]

You may not be aware, but it is against the rules of football for a club manager to enter the pitch and physically get involved in the game.
I’d guess even a 5 year old knows that basics

Christ on a bike. The manager decides which players are on the pitch and the positions they play in.

I'd say that's playing a pretty big part in a match.

[redstarfk]

And yet no mention of the manager....

Why would there be ?

[afc1903mad]

You dont include one of the biggest factors in a "who's at fault" thread.

But you know this and you are quite happy to defend the clowns running our Club so i dont expect anything better from you.

Plenty opportunities to discuss and debate the managers faults elsewhere.
I’ve yet to see one debateable point even suggesting that (take today’s goal as an example) tactics was the root cause to blame the manager.

But it didn’t detract from your “desperation” to try and be liked over the internet.

Nevermind.

[afc1903mad]

Howler by Lewis. Nobody else to blame as far as I could see.
Although some of our players including Considine and McGinn seemed to be complaining to the linesman about something. Was there any suggestion of offside or a foul in the build up ? Can't say I saw anything.

There was a suspicion of offside when the ball went wide.
I’d need to see it again as not the best view along the line from the South Stand.

[Don_Corleone]

Plenty opportunities to discuss and debate the managers faults elsewhere.
I’ve yet to see one debateable point even suggesting that (take today’s goal as an example) tactics was the root cause to blame the manager.

But it didn’t detract from your “desperation” to try and be liked over the internet.

Nevermind.

To be fair, there’s a sense in which the manager has to take overall responsibility for every defeat or draw as he picks the players, formation, tactics etc. However I understand the point in this thread is to track which players are specifically at fault for conceding goals. I think it’s too different things. Lewis is to blame for us losing that goal today. McInnes has to take overall responsibility for us not winning against the bottom team in the league at home and putting in a dismal performance in the process - 2 shots on target in 90 minutes is shocking but sadly it’s not unusual for us this season. If you have that few shots on target in a game you’re not going to be winning very often

[Jupiter]

The manager is always at fault. That goes without saying.

[afc1903mad]

The manager is always at fault. That goes without saying.

Really????
It’s mentioned all the time
That’s fine though, everyone is entitled to an opinion.
This thread is for the players on the pitch

[nice1simmy]

Really????
It’s mentioned all the time
That’s fine though, everyone is entitled to an opinion.
This thread is for the players on the pitch

All eleven players that started yesterday and the three subs that came on,they were all sh!t,that good enough for you??

[Devanha Red]

This thread is for the players on the pitch

Who put them on the pitch?

[NaeMairNeeps]

Who put them on the pitch?

Ah'm o' the belief they made their own way there unassisted in any physical sense, but, McInnes put them on the starting line up team sheet.

..... But he would not have been able to do if their mothers had not given birth to them, which would not have happened if their fathers had not spunked up their mothers ....

How far back do you want to go?

How about ye jist fυckin accept the thread was set up as a wee corner tae analyse errors/shortcomings of players on the park in relation to goals conceded. How about ye maybe accept that a handful of us might want tae discuss/debate same, within said parameters, and would even enjoy such 'banter' if arseholes like yersel were not apparently so bloodymindedly determined to **** it up purely for the sake of fυcking it up.

There is a thread dedicated to the faults of DM .... If I remember correctly, it is entitled ... errm ... let me think .... Derek McInnes?

There's one about wiggy as well .... should be easy to find.

As I eluded to in earlier posts, I have no interest at all in Nfl to me, it is pointless .. personally .... Would it be appropriate for me to post in there and spew my dislike for Nfl? Harp on about how pointless it their thread is? .... I think not .... it would mark me out as a fυckin bampot intent on fυckin up other folks' banter for no reason other than fυckin it up ....

So I choose not to post there, and let them get on with that thread they 'see the point in' ... and I also backtrack - if they see the point, then it is not pointless - whatever I might think. Any danger I can ask others to do, or don't, likewise?

If folks really want this whole forum fυcked up .... then go for it ... one thread at a time. See how quickly the '**** it up for the sake of ****ing it up' virus spreads to those threads you personally believe should be immune. If the evidence is not already there, then I suggest you go make an appointment with Donsdaft.

If, otherwise, you want the forum to make sense, and be useful to the dwindling membership, then try, just try, to accept that there will be threads which are of no interest to you ... and will be of no more interest nor greater quality for your input.

But there are other threads more worthy of you engagement ... and if not? Well fυckin start one!

As I said, I was very interested in participating in this thread ... I have been put off by the wanton disruption by members who have no interest in participating in any real sense, and I gave up.

I would actually still like to participate, but there seems little point as long as the unnecessary fυckin 'noise' persists.