+ Visit Rotherham United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: why oh why tidser?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    1,009

    why oh why tidser?

    right i understand the need to shape the squad get a striker in etc.

    but getting rid of a player who was arguably the best on display against gillingham only a couple of weeks ago is ridiculous.

    we are running a tight ship its clear and one of the four midfielders had to go but not tidser.

    it should have been o'connor. he has been the least impressive out of the four this season and has been in and out the team cos of injuries for weeks. and we paid for tidser and worrall

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    12,462

    re: why oh why tidser?

    easy answer...
    nards out millers not happy dicko in, millers happy again...

    noble out, millers not happy... tidser in millers happy again..

    sharp out, millers not happy... morgan in millers happy again.

    ainsworth out, millers not happy.. worrell in, millers happy again...

    ect ect ect... have to agree though. i did like tidser

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    1,009

    re: why oh why tidser?

    Quote Originally Posted by caytonmiller
    easy answer...
    nards out millers not happy dicko in, millers happy again...

    noble out, millers not happy... tidser in millers happy again..

    sharp out, millers not happy... morgan in millers happy again.

    ainsworth out, millers not happy.. worrell in, millers happy again...

    ect ect ect... have to agree though. i did like tidser
    noble out, i was jumping for joy

    sharps out, i personally drove him to burton

    ainsworth out, i said 'hmm'

    nards out, i said 'why not effing tubbs!', now we have neither lol

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    475

    re: why oh why tidser?

    Quote Originally Posted by TMiller
    right i understand the need to shape the squad get a striker in etc.

    but getting rid of a player who was arguably the best on display against gillingham only a couple of weeks ago is ridiculous.

    we are running a tight ship its clear and one of the four midfielders had to go but not tidser.

    it should have been o'connor. he has been the least impressive out of the four this season and has been in and out the team cos of injuries for weeks. and we paid for tidser and worrall
    Oconnor was the best player never mind midfielder for first 15 games until his injury

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,353

    re: why oh why tidser?

    don't understand this at all, he was cracking player in the few games he played

    we are either skint and evans told to get players off the books
    or evans hasn't got a clue what he is doing
    or the lad wanted to leave

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    16,763

    re: why oh why tidser?

    Alternatively he's fourth choice central midfielder at the moment (behind Frecklington, O'Connor, Milsom) & long term for his development it makes sense for him to play regular first team football & then come back a better player for the first team.

    Didn't do Leigh Griffiths any harm for Wolves.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    18,189

    re: why oh why tidser?

    Quote Originally Posted by caytonmiller
    easy answer...
    nards out millers not happy dicko in, millers happy again...

    noble out, millers not happy... tidser in millers happy again..

    sharp out, millers not happy... morgan in millers happy again.

    ainsworth out, millers not happy.. worrell in, millers happy again...

    ect ect ect... have to agree though. i did like tidser
    worrell in - out
    Tidser in - out

    ...ya do the hoakey coakey

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •