+ Visit Motherwell FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Lost Sky revenue

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,206

    Lost Sky revenue

    Will the postponement of Inverness game to be shown 'live' on Sky affect clubs January recruitment and/or force the exit of Hutchinson? Assume Sky money may have influenced Ainsworth loan extension if believe every post suggesting we're poor as a church mouse and no cup revenue to look forward

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    4,824

    re: Lost Sky revenue

    Quote Originally Posted by dasdeid
    Will the postponement of Inverness game to be shown 'live' on Sky affect clubs January recruitment and/or force the exit of Hutchinson? Assume Sky money may have influenced Ainsworth loan extension if believe every post suggesting we're poor as a church mouse and no cup revenue to look forward
    I think the days of clubs getting a fee per game shown are gone. The annual fee all clubs get from sky cover all games. What I find amazing is yet again we are the only club in the SPL to have a postponement. We apparently had work done again in the summer (for what ? it doesn't seem to work). I know the ground has had six times as much as normal rainfall but so did every other club in the country.

    The quicker we move to an artificial surface or get out of Fir Park can't come too soon for me.

  3. #3

    re: Lost Sky revenue

    The postponement won't cost us TV money, just normal costs of rescheduling.

    Games got abandoned at thistle and Inverness this year, there's just too much rain at times. Our pitch has actually been good recently, most postponements have come from other issues.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    232

    re: Lost Sky revenue

    Think the postponment was as much to do with the fact we were playing Inverness and an early decision was needed

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    4,824

    re: Lost Sky revenue

    Quote Originally Posted by Handsome_Devil
    The postponement won't cost us TV money, just normal costs of rescheduling.

    Games got abandoned at thistle and Inverness this year, there's just too much rain at times. Our pitch has actually been good recently, most postponements have come from other issues.
    Thistle haven't relaid their surface 3 times, put new drainage in three times and spent over a million quid on their surface over the last 3 years. Id be quite happy with postponements if we spent next to buggger all on the pitch.

  6. #6

    re: Lost Sky revenue

    Sadly that money didn't make our pitch better than anyone else's, it was just playing catch up. The rest of the stadium is the much bigger problem now.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    4,273

    re: Lost Sky revenue

    Much of our drainage problem relates to the surrounding topography. Whether we like it or not Fir Park is built on a slope and the water drains down into the pitch from the east/south east. No amount of reasonably costed drainage work will alter that.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    4,824

    re: Lost Sky revenue

    Quote Originally Posted by Wellup4it
    Much of our drainage problem relates to the surrounding topography. Whether we like it or not Fir Park is built on a slope and the water drains down into the pitch from the east/south east. No amount of reasonably costed drainage work will alter that.
    So why so plough so much money into it? surely make do and mend is sufficient if the problem is so in surmountable.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    4,273

    re: Lost Sky revenue

    [quote="steviex" date="02:35 on 07 Jan
    So why so plough so much money into it? surely make do and mend is sufficient if the problem is so in surmountable.[/quote]

    I suppose the reason is that the SPFL would start hitting us with ever increasing sanctions if we adopted a "Do Min" approach. At some point shareholders and perhaps others would become restive if they saw the company knowingly incur hefty fines.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    4,824

    re: Lost Sky revenue

    Quote Originally Posted by "Wellup4it"02:35 on 07 Jan
    So why so plough so much money into it? surely make do and mend is sufficient if the problem is so in surmountable.[/quote

    I suppose the reason is that the SPFL would start hitting us with ever increasing sanctions if we adopted a "Do Min" approach. At some point shareholders and perhaps others would become restive if they saw the company knowingly incur hefty fines.

    Others seem to be able to maintain a playable surface at a fraction of the cost we do and I just don't buy this notion that the surface at Motherwell is unique of all clubs. Anyway maybe one day we will be shot of the place a bottomless pit for money.

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •