+ Visit Nottingham Forest FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Thread: Connor Wickham

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    20,660

    Connor Wickham

    Surely even we aren't that desperate to throw money around? Who sets these ridiculous prices?
    First Sako from lg 1 for ?4 million, now this.
    I need a lye down I think, - view external link

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,256

    re: Connor Wickham

    Hmmmmmmmm Daily Fail.
    Isn't that where Davies's nemesis 'works'?

    I'd take this with a large pinch of, er, HP Source. - view external link

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,219

    re: Connor Wickham

    Well they say promotion is worth ?80m, even if you only come straight back down so in that case I'd take the risk.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    20,660

    re: Connor Wickham

    Quote Originally Posted by BigusDikus
    Well they say promotion is worth ?80m, even if you only come straight back down so in that case I'd take the risk.
    I don't mind a gamble BD, when I can see what I'm betting on. How does 9 goals at Sheff Weds, put you in the ?5 million bracket? I'm stunned.


    Lee Hughes will be on the market again next for ?4 million, saying hes still got fresher legs, due to being banged up.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,219

    re: Connor Wickham

    Sunderland paid 8m for him so you could say 5m is a bargain.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    20,660

    re: Connor Wickham

    Quote Originally Posted by BigusDikus
    Sunderland paid 8m for him so you could say 5m is a bargain.
    Still don't believe bargin is the right word.
    ?8 million was based on potential. O'Neill didn't seem to rate him, so still unproven.
    Still a major gamble for a championship club at that price.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,219

    re: Connor Wickham

    Quote Originally Posted by Trickytreesreds
    Sunderland paid 8m for him so you could say 5m is a bargain.
    Still don't believe bargin is the right word [/quote]

    You're right it's BARGAIN.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    20,660

    re: Connor Wickham

    Quote Originally Posted by BigusDikus
    Sunderland paid 8m for him so you could say 5m is a bargain.
    Still don't believe bargin is the right word [/quote]

    You're right it's BARGAIN. [/quote]

    My god, I've been spelling policed. Are you EP's love child?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    3,987

    re: Connor Wickham

    He's still only 20 so still got time on his hands to show that potential.i do think 5 is a little steep but that's football.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,256

    re: Connor Wickham

    Quote Originally Posted by Polish_ForestMad
    He's still only 20 so still got time on his hands to show that potential.i do think 5 is a little steep but that's football.
    ...'time on his hands to show potential' is no good when we are potentially going to be spunking millions on a (panic buy) striker who we absolutely need to hit the ground running.
    Or go for Shane Long if we want a striker who hits the ground

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •