ched evans again?

[lansdowneoldskool]

Of course I condemn all rapists, Mick - I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of banno. He loves to hang on to the outskirts of Wednesday hooligans.
He expresses his hatred of someone who has scored a few goals for United but so far has been too fearful to condemn his Barnsley drinking buddy.

[Katchouro]

I've read some rubbish on here over the years but the hypocritical nonsense on this thread makes me want to puke.
There isn't one person on here that would talk of second chances and differing kinds of rape if it happened to there daughter or relative.

Ah the 'what if it were your ...' argument. Oft lazily traipsed out in death penalty debates. If she was my daughter I'd been angry and frustrated, but on the flip side if Evans was my son I'd feel angry and frustrated - as YOU would be.

But I'm doing my damndest to raise my kids so they won't make the same destructive lifestyle choices of both the Rapist and the Victim in this whole sorry affair.



You're a hypocrite banno, but I'll engage you, that is if you genuinely want to discuss the topic and not just use a rape victim to points score against United.

Clayton McDonald, innocent or guilty? Give me an answer and a paragraph detailing why. 'He's not guilty because

[mcbrewer]

Clayton Donaldson went through the same trial procedure as Evans and the evidence in his case showed in the opinion of the jury that he was innocent so hes innocent no research necessary .

[Katchouro]

So mcbrewer not only can't be bothered to read a couple of pages of text, he also can't be bothered to get the of the bloke right.

He also can't read simple instructions - yet he's able and willing to formulate strong opinions on the subject.

Not having a go at him specifically, just this lazy sluggish mental slobishness that is so prevalent.



Anyone else?

[aussieowl]

So mcbrewer not only can't be bothered to read a couple of pages of text, he also can't be bothered to get the of the bloke right.

He also can't read simple instructions - yet he's able and willing to formulate strong opinions on the subject.

Not having a go at him specifically, just this lazy sluggish mental slobishness that is so prevalent.



Anyone else?

I think the gist of why McDonald was found not guilty is down to the prior interaction between him & the victim, they were seen together, they went to the hotel together etc...so it could be argued that McDonald might have a reasonable expectation of ***.

Evans on the other hand stole in like a thief in the night & exited via a fire escape, it could be argued she had no idea he was even there...very poorly put by me but you get the idea.

[Edwyn_Chevans]

Won't be too long now.

I You Banno
X

[braggyowl]

You have an anagram as a convicted rapist as your username...Go away you sick b'astard!

[mcbrewer]

So mcbrewer not only can't be bothered to read a couple of pages of text, he also can't be bothered to get the of the bloke right.

He also can't read simple instructions - yet he's able and willing to formulate strong opinions on the subject.

Not having a go at him specifically, just this lazy sluggish mental slobishness that is so prevalent.



Anyone else?

Or maybe a stupid typo because i was reading an article about Clayton Donaldson but then i suppose its an own goal
sStill doesn't alter the fact that McDonald went through a trial and was found to be innocent on the evidence presented.
What you and your ilk can't get your heads around is that each case in english law is a seperate entity and whilst cases can efect each other they remain seperate entities.
Why don't you do what many on your board have done possibly you as well ( can't be ****d to check ) and compare madine to a rapist ?

[aussieowl]

You have an anagram as a convicted rapist as your username...Go away you sick b'astard!

Its more of a Spoonerism...I'll bet his real is Cedar Hunt.

[braggyowl]

Or RAW KEN aussie if it is an anagram.