Seems to read that he can move within the ban if he wants.
Not due back until November 1st I think, big gamble someone taking him now for big money
Does the ban from "all football activity" include potential transfer?
Watching SSP the cencus is that a growing number of Liverpool fans want to see the back of him.
Seems to read that he can move within the ban if he wants.
Not due back until November 1st I think, big gamble someone taking him now for big money
What The Daily Mail is saying - view external link
He can be transferred but the ban still applies ie if he moves he can't be involved with his new club until the ban is over and that includes training
Suarez obviously isn't right in his head. Personally, I think his ban should be for International games only. I think he's already served his punishment with not being able to play for his country for the rest of this world cup.
I agree gary. I think that he should have got a 12-month ban from Uruguay games with a suspended sentence for domestic matches.
The current club ban is harsh on Liverpool...but then they knew what they were getting when they signed him so there is that argument as well
I think the worrying part of this whole affair is the attitude of the Uraguay squad and FA in general. They would appear to think it a perfectly normal occurrence to bite another human being.
I believe their reaction in the 24 hours after the incident has not helped Bugs Bunny, I think the sentence would have been less if they had shown any kind of contrition.
And Liverpool, although I feel a little sympathy, they have pampered to his every whim .
No sympathy for Liverpool whatsoever.
Yes he's an amazing talent, but being a great footballer is as much about conduct as it is talent.
He's brought shame on them a number of times and they've stood by him like idiots time and time again.
I agree with Eric about the Uruguay squad. The interview with that tw@t Lugano was a joke. Shame on them!
I won't throw any stones at Liverpool in case I break the glass house that is BWFC after the support that the club gave Diouf
Obviously, biting an opponent is a thuggish thing to do and it's just something I can't comprehend. Is biting an opponent any worse than being spat at in the face like Diouf did to De Zeeuw? Diouf got banned for 3 games and was fined 2 weeks wages by us. I just think Suarez's ban is far too excessive. (I'd love my Mrs to give me a love bite )
Roy Keane's tackle on Alf Inge Haaland is the kind of tackle or assault that should receive such a lengthy ban imo.