Again champs I agree fully
pretty sure a certain somebody won't be on here
Onwards and upwards let's beat Brighton and everything remains rosey in the garden.
We'd all like that Saxo. But I can assure you that this team can only do one thing well, and that's attack. The rest of it, is average or below. It's hard to keep up the momentum to attack for 97 minutes. If you want to say he got it wrong tonight, you'll have to say it's because he subbed Marshall. That would have reduced the number of times we attacked, (or could). That said, from a winning position, most managers would, because you want him fit in as many games as possible. What would you have done?[/quote]Originally Posted by DanRrr
left marshall on, and brought dunn on as an extra midfielder to retain possestion. basic, and i mean BASIC, management against 10 men.
Again champs I agree fully
pretty sure a certain somebody won't be on here
Onwards and upwards let's beat Brighton and everything remains rosey in the garden.
Originally Posted by champs95
Would being 2 points off the top 2 be consider 'contenders?'[/quote]
having the ability to hold a 0-2 lead against 10 men would convince me we are contenders. now i just think under GB we`ll always be the bridesmaids..
We'd all like that Saxo. But I can assure you that this team can only do one thing well, and that's attack. The rest of it, is average or below. It's hard to keep up the momentum to attack for 97 minutes. If you want to say he got it wrong tonight, you'll have to say it's because he subbed Marshall. That would have reduced the number of times we attacked, (or could). That said, from a winning position, most managers would, because you want him fit in as many games as possible. What would you have done?[/quote]Originally Posted by jordan12rhodes
left marshall on, and brought dunn on as an extra midfielder to retain possestion. basic, and i mean BASIC, management against 10 men.[/quote]
Dunn? You clearly have not been to games recently!
And what if Marshall was flaggin
you make it sound like it`s almost a given! christ knows what evidence you have to back that up..Originally Posted by robinrover
Originally Posted by robinrover
Ah, he's harmless. He says alot, but nothing of any value. I clocked his knowledge of footy years ago. Very excitable, when we win we are the greatest, when we lose it's all over. Football by numbers.
We'd all like that Saxo. But I can assure you that this team can only do one thing well, and that's attack. The rest of it, is average or below. It's hard to keep up the momentum to attack for 97 minutes. If you want to say he got it wrong tonight, you'll have to say it's because he subbed Marshall. That would have reduced the number of times we attacked, (or could). That said, from a winning position, most managers would, because you want him fit in as many games as possible. What would you have done?[/quote]Originally Posted by DanRrr
left marshall on, and brought dunn on as an extra midfielder to retain possestion. basic, and i mean BASIC, management against 10 men.[/quote]
Dunn? You clearly have not been to games
Well saxo it isn't a given however 10 points from the last 4 makes it a little more easier to believe it can happen.
you make it sound like it`s almost a given! christ knows what evidence you have to back that up..[/quote]Originally Posted by jordan12rhodes
One defeat in 9 may be a reason?
I fkn Saxo...logic is ignored.
I will admit I'm annoyed a 2 goal lead slipping to 10 man Millwall though. I do think the players have a hand in it though. Having 4 individuals rather than a unit at the back doesn't help either.