Originally Posted by
redstarfk
Can only speak for myself , but as someone who's happy with McInnes , I've never really thought that their dominance over us was down to Rodgers being a better manager or tactician than McInnes
It's the vastly larger resources available to Rodgers that's far and away the main reason. And Rodgers is a competent enough manager to capitalise on that massive advantage.
It'd be interesting to see how Rodgers and McInnes got on against each other if the roles had been reversed