You could call this the "McInnes question" - is an overall level of performance that is objectively good still acceptable if there appears to be little prospect of ever exceeding said level of performance?
Timing is everything and unfortunately our timing was sh*t. The team from 92/93 would have won the league in 93/94.
Last edited by ragnarok; 30-04-2018 at 11:11 PM.
If you could make it clearer that would be good. Right now all I can make out is that Pacman makes his view known and you then basically tell him he's talking pish and that he "lacks ability". Then shortly after you have a go at Mason for not considering your viewpoint.
You seem to do that a lot though.
Earlier...
Quote Originally Posted by afc1903mad View Post
nice "rant" PacMan, but we've heard it before but "lacks the ability to recognise" the oppositions strengths, just our weaknesses.
Meanwhile...
Quote Originally Posted by afc1903mad View Post
I recognise "your inability to consider any opposition viewpoints"
Tell me what value posting a youtube clip of a cuckoo clock adds.
I can't see what debatable point he has made to my post.
Clear difference from the PacMan post where I respect Pac's opinion, bored with the repetition and articulated that it lack recognition in the oppositions strengths, only focusing on our weaknesses. At least I'm expressing why I disagreed with their post.
Opinions can be expressed, respected and debated. Adding nothing but a meme or attempt to play the man instead of the ball (you'll / he'll love that) adds nothing to the debate, in my opinion
C’mon the Pars. Stuff that PJM’s good and proper tonight and keep them in their rightful division. ⚪️⚫️⚪️⚫️