+ Visit Rotherham United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: We can have our Ball back...

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    24,736

    We can have our Ball back...

    ... is that a good or bad thing I wonder..
    http://www.peterboroughtoday.co.uk/s...home-1-7841462

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    10,122
    Quote Originally Posted by rolymiller View Post
    ... is that a good or bad thing I wonder..
    http://www.peterborough.************...e.asp?a=482140
    Gotta be a good thing, he's our player after all, get him back into the swing of things ready for next season!!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    35,285
    How does this work then under the new rules? He was sent there until end of season and can't go out on loan now.

    Surely if they send him back the he should be available otherwise that's him done until end of season, that can't be right can it?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    4,640
    Sure I read somewhere recently MT where a player was recalled/returned due to injury or similar, (dementia sets in), where he was not allowed to feature in his parent clubs plans for the rest of this season.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    35,285
    Quote Originally Posted by kentmillerman View Post
    Sure I read somewhere recently MT where a player was recalled/returned due to injury or similar, (dementia sets in), where he was not allowed to feature in his parent clubs plans for the rest of this season.
    Yes I can understand the injury bit because he could always go back when fit but that's not the case here.
    If he can't play a part then the rule needs looking at because that's just stopping a player doing his job isn't it.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    10,122
    Quote Originally Posted by millertop View Post
    Yes I can understand the injury bit because he could always go back when fit but that's not the case here.
    If he can't play a part then the rule needs looking at because that's just stopping a player doing his job isn't it.
    That would be a bit weird so yeh, the rule needs a tweak or two.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    4,640
    So who does the tweek or two. Do I need to ask really.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    35,285
    Quote Originally Posted by millertop View Post
    How does this work then under the new rules? He was sent there until end of season and can't go out on loan now.

    Surely if they send him back the he should be available otherwise that's him done until end of season, that can't be right can it?

    Just been confirmed by our club that he's still registered with Posh even thought they sent him back and can't play for us.

    What a stupid rule.

    I put this on the other thread by footymad (why they multiply threads? )

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    3,810
    Quote Originally Posted by millertop View Post

    I put this on the other thread by footymad (why they multiply threads? )
    So people can put up multiple answers??

    Bizarre rule, if we did need him ( which we don't) then they keep his registration & he won't be playing for anyone.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •